Gazette: House bill on student voting rights in limbo
Measure would expand power for school board member
...There are several reasons why the county's student school board members should not have expanded voting rights, said Sen. Rona E. Kramer (D-Dist. 14) of Olney.
Students rely on their teachers for grades, she said, so if student board members voted against a matter that affected teachers, their grades could be affected.
Another pressure could come from parents, Kramer said. If the student school board member goes to a friend's house, the parents could lean on the student to vote in favor of proposals that could help their neighborhood, she said.
"That's a lot of pressure on a student," Kramer said. "I think we've completely lost sight of common sense. These students are elected by 12-year-olds. We're going to allow a person not elected by the taxpayers to vote on a $2 billion budget?"
And, the MCPS Student Board of Education member is "supervised" by an employee of Superintendent Jerry Weast creating a serious conflict of interest. That MCPS supervisor uses Operating Budget funds via a MCPS procurement card to buy perks for the student government officers.
The Student Member of the Board of Education is far from an independent voice for all MCPS students and more like an extension of the Superintendent.
Board of Education members are supposed to be the body that oversees the Superintendent and the school system. Under the current election process and Superintendent's supervision of the position, the integrity of the Student Member of the Board of Education position as an independent voice for students has been seriously compromised.




0 comments:
Post a Comment
Blogger is experiencing technical difficulties in posting comments. If your comment does not appear in 24 hours, please send your comment directly to our e-mail address at contact@parentscoalitionmc.com