Sunday, June 12, 2011

Wash Post: "...or is it really a slush fund?"

Montgomery's $18 million "miracle"
Abracadabra! The schools "discover" a windfall. Or is it really a slush fund?
Washington Post, Sunday, June 12, 2011, page A18

(...)

Now — presto! — the schools have conjured $21 million in “savings,” mostly, they say, because hale and hearty employees have suddenly reduced their health insurance claims by $15 million to $18 million.

That raises a question: Will the windfall be directed to the classroom, to avoid planned layoffs of special education instructors, remedial reading teachers and counselors, for instance? No, says the school board (and, more to the point, the teachers union, which really calls the shots — and announced the decision). Instead, much of the money will be used to spare employees from a small hike in their ultra-low health insurance premiums.

(...)

To the naked eye, it appears the schools were using their insurance claims budget as a sort of slush fund.
(...)

1 comment:

  1. From George Leventhal's Facebook Page:

    The County Council is consumed with this issue right now and I am too close to it to be objective. What do you think, facebook friends? Are you aware of this dispute between the council and the school system? We need to tone down the rhetoric and the drama and focus on the key question, which is, in my view: is the school system accountable for the money it spends?

    ReplyDelete

If your comment does not appear in 24 hours, please send your comment directly to our e-mail address:
parentscoalitionmc AT outlook.com