Pages

Wednesday, August 28, 2013

2013 Strand 5: MCPS Goes From 6 to 51 schools in the Lowest MSDE Category

Flower Hill Elementary 0.8962
North Chevy Chase Elementary 0.8897
Greencastle Elementary 0.8893
Dr. Sally K. Ride Elementary 0.8889
Clarksburg Elementary 0.8854
Silver Spring International Middle 0.8829
Stedwick Elementary 0.8808
Rocky Hill Middle 0.8808
Jones Lane Elementary 0.8807
Rock Creek Forest Elementary 0.8807
Brookhaven Elementary 0.8802
Martin Luther King Jr. Middle 0.88
Eastern Middle School 0.8799
Ridgeview Middle 0.8753
Earle B. Wood Middle 0.8753
Rolling Terrace Elementary 0.8743
Redland Middle 0.8735
Judith A. Resnik Elementary 0.8733
Summit Hall Elementary 0.8722
Broad Acres Elementary 0.8713
Weller Road Elementary 0.8705
Ritchie Park Elementary 0.8644
South Lake Elementary 0.8595
Burning Tree Elementary 0.8516
Great Seneca Creek Elementary 0.8514
Glen Haven Elementary 0.8508
Montgomery Village Middle School 0.8488
Rosemont Elementary 0.8464
Francis Scott Key Middle 0.8445
Harmony Hills Elementary 0.8444
S. Christa McAuliffe Elementary 0.8435
Argyle Middle 0.837
Sequoyah Elementary 0.8346
New Hampshire Estates Elem 0.8263
Glenallan Elementary 0.8205
DuFief Elementary 0.8147
Gaithersburg Elementary 0.8126
A. Mario Loiederman Middle 0.8058
Oak View Elementary 0.8044
Flora M. Singer Elementary School 0.8038
Strathmore Elementary 0.8018
White Oak Middle 0.7793
Montgomery Knolls Elementary 0.7779
Carl Sandburg Center 0.7752
Takoma Park Elementary 0.7699
Cresthaven Elementary 0.7607
Briggs Chaney Middle 0.7524
Neelsville Middle 0.752
Captain James E. Daly Elementary 0.7483
Bel Pre Elementary 0.7467
Forest Oak Middle 0.7403

If schools fall into Strand 5, the schools have a School Progress Index score lower than 0.9 but may have met as many as two of their targets for Achievement, Gap, and Growth (elementary/middle schools) or Achievement, Gap, and College- and Career-Readiness indicators (high schools) per grade span. The lowest-progressing schools in the State will fall into Strand 5. Schools falling into this strand will generally display school-wide issues that require additional, differentiated services from the LEA. These schools are also going to present the most need from student services. Required supports for Strand 5 schools that are not Title I include using the School Improvement Grant (SIG) process. The SIG process provides clear needs assessments and support through the LEA Turnaround offices. Those Title I schools in this Strand may have access to additional school improvement dollars with well defined plans for improvement. All schools, Title I or non-Title I, will receive differentiated support from the LEA.
Monitoring of these schools will be covered by the LEA and MSDE if they are Priority or Focus. The other schools will be required to provide assurances within the Master Plan to the State Superintendent of Schools that all required interventions, reporting, and monitoring are being supplied by the LEA.

Click here for MCPS Strand 5 from 2012.

No comments:

Post a Comment

If your comment does not appear in 24 hours, please send your comment directly to our e-mail address:
parentscoalitionmc AT outlook.com