...But if it weren’t for the bankruptcy case, which allowed for claims that fall outside of their state’s statute of limitations, Gillispie and other survivors in Maryland would stand virtually no chance of holding the Boy Scouts accountable in court.
That’s because lawmakers in Maryland have not provided a path for older survivors to sue, even as dozens of other states have reopened their statutes of limitations in child sexual abuse cases.
The Boy Scouts bankruptcy allows a rare chance to put numbers to how severely Maryland’s statute of limitations undercuts survivors’ legal options.
About 1,300 total claims against the Boy Scouts originated in Maryland, according to a group representing the survivors in court. (The exact number was still being tallied as of earlier this year.)
Of that number, only 13 claims fell within Maryland’s statute of limitations based on the survivor's age...
https://news.yahoo.com/marylands-statute-limitations-undermines-abuse-171818057.html
The loafing lofty legislators
ReplyDeleteWasted efforts another year
Reinserting legal loopholes
From surplus of yesteryear.
The morally corrupt lawmakers
Place protocol above principles
Dodging the perennial loopholes
While grooming for loftier roles.
Not to worry the MOAG is on top of it: https://www.marylandattorneygeneral.gov/Pages/reporting.aspx
ReplyDeleteIn other words, it will not see the light of day. . .
Delete