Showing posts with label Jud Ashman. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jud Ashman. Show all posts

Friday, October 16, 2020

As City of Gaithersburg Takes $1.5M +/- "Gift" from MoCo Board of Education, Who Sits on City Ethics Commission But a MoCo Board of Ed. member. #Ethics

The City of Gaithersburg has cut a deal with the Montgomery County Board of Education to allow the Board of Education to build an elementary school on a public City park that serves 5 communities.  

The Board of Education had put forth that the land was being given over at no cost, but the actual contract reveals that the Board of Education will be spending over $1.5 million dollars +/- to pay the City of Gaithersburg what can only be described as gifts since the contract does not detail the actual cost of these items. The gifts to the City are to be paid for by the Board of Education and will include an artificial turf football field (and costs for the future replacement of that field), bleachers, lighting and a tot lot.  

Clearly, the land is not being handed over to the Board of Education at "no cost."  But what is the exact cost to the Board of Education and the MCPS Operating Budget? That number can only be estimated as no exact cost was included in the contract.  

If any any point in time there are ever allegations of unethical actions by the City of Gaithersburg elected leaders or their staff, any such complaint would go before the City of Gaithersburg Ethics Commission

Montgomery County Board of Education member Rebecca Smondrowski is a member of the City of Gaithersburg Ethics Commission. 

From Board member Smondrowki's online MCPS bio:  

Mrs. Smondrowski was reappointed as a Commissioner for the City of Gaithersburg Ethics Commission in January 2015.

https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/boe/members/district2.aspx

Tuesday, January 24, 2017

It’s a one-woman show against Mobilitie’s rights of way crusade #SilverSpring #Maryland

Mobilitie might have met the one woman in America who has the best chance with the FCC to have the agency bridle, what she describes as, the distributed antenna system (DAS) provider’s desire to “run roughshod over local communities” as it attempts to reduce rights of way fees that they say will impede future 5G growth.

But Mobilitie has the support of CTIA, and the influential trade group believes that there are onerous approval processes in many communities that could prevent the U.S. from enjoying the full benefits of new wireless technology due to fewer small cells being deployed, and they agree that high fees to use utility poles are a clear obstruction.

On Dec. 22, 2016, the FCC said it was seeking comments regarding streamlining its wireless siting policies, an effort by the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (WTB) that stems, in part, from a petition for a declaratory ruling filed by Mobilitie, LLC titled: “Promoting Broadband for All Americans by prohibiting Excessive Charges for Access to Public Rights of Way (PROW).

Maryland resident stands out amongst commenters
 
Thirty-two commenters have responded to date with ten being posted Tuesday, nine of them extolling the need to limit wireless siting due to WiFi and cell tower RF concerns, one oxymoronically suggesting that the U.S. would be better off if it cut its wireless umbilical cord and returned to Ethernet cables.

But tucked in-between the commenters who don’t address the WTB’s interest in how to best build out a timely 5G network is correspondence from Silver Springs, Md. resident Sue Present who said that Mobilitie was trafficking in hyperbole and belonged to a wireless industry cabal of “conniving, gluttonous bullies.”

At their initial read, a WTB staffer could possibly pass off Present’s opening salvo as the rantings of a NIMBY protester concerned about RF wafting underneath their tinfoil chapeau.
Fortunately for Present, they’ll read further...

http://wirelessestimator.com/articles/2017/its-a-one-woman-show-against-mobilities-rights-of-way-crusade/

Wednesday, January 4, 2017

City of Gaithersburg Cited by State Ethics Commission for Failure to Comply with State Ethics Law

BOE Member on City of Gaithersburg Ethics Commission. Hearing on 1st Complaint in 35 Years on Thursday.

The Gaithersburg Ethics Commission plans to meet behind closed doors on Thursday to review a complaint filed that alleges a violation of the city’s ethics ordinance.
Gaithersburg City Attorney Lynn Board said it’s the first ethics complaint on record, going back as far as 35 years.

Board would not disclose any information about the complaint, except that the city is bringing in outside counsel, Elissa Levan of Funk and Bolton, for the meeting.

Levan said she would be advising the Commission about establishing rules of procedure in open session. According to the agenda for the meeting, the Commission is then expected to call for a closed session to review the complaint.

The Ethics Commission is comprised of four members: Steven Blivess (an alternate member), Ian Kessler, Sally Marchessault (the chair), and Rebecca Smondrowski. The members are city residents and cannot be city employees. They are appointed by the mayor with the approval of the city council for three-year terms. Two members of the Commission constitute a quorum.
The city’s Ethics Code applies to all city employees, all elected officials, as well as officials appointed to some boards and commissions.

According to the Ethics Commission’s rules of procedures, a complaint must be filed in writing and signed under oath alleging a specific violation of a provision of the Ethics Code. The complaint must be filed within one year of the alleged violation.

Notice of the Jan. 5th Ethics Commission meeting and executive session has been posted on the city’s website, here. You can find more about the city’s Ethics Code online, here.

http://www.mymcmedia.org/ethics-complaint-filed-at-gaithersburg-city-hall/

Wednesday, December 2, 2015

City of Gaithersburg: "this system for providing facilities is not working." @mcps @mocoboe

Testimony of the City of Gaithersburg Before the Montgomery County Board of Education on the Superintendent's Recommended FY 2016 Capital Budget and the FY 2017-2022 Capital Improvements Program

November 12, 2015

Good evening President O’Neil and members of the Board of Education. My name is Jud Ashman and I have the honor of being the Mayor of the City of Gaithersburg. I am here this evening to provide the City’s comments on the Interim Superintendent’s recommended Capital Improvements Plan. Unfortunately, we were not able to testify on November 9th as it conflicted with the Swearing in Ceremony for newly elected officials in Gaithersburg.
I’m joined tonight by several members of the City Council.

We appreciate the work that went into both the CIP and the supplemental recommendations. While the City would like to speak to all of the concerns related to clusters serving Gaithersburg students, in the interest of time I will touch on a few key issues.

Gaithersburg Cluster

It is projected that between FY 2017 and FY 2022, enrollment at each of the four elementary schools in the Gaithersburg cluster will exceed capacity by 172 seats or more. Since 2007, school enrollment in the Gaithersburg cluster has increased by nearly 600 students.

As part of the Interim Superintendent’s recommendations, we noted that an addition to alleviate the overutilization of Summit Hall was tabled due to the concerns associated with the timing and incorporation of the addition with the scheduled rev/ex of the school. The City strongly supports the community’s request to accelerate the construction of an addition or the rev/ex to alleviate overutilization as expeditiously as possible. We understand Summit Hall was identified by a recent County OLO study as a school whose FACT score may change, resulting in a change in its order in the queue. We look forward to the recommendations of the FACT Review Committee and hope that the project moves forward on a more appropriate timeline.

The Council and I are dismayed that no real solution was offered to address the overutilization of Gaithersburg Elementary School. More than 800 students currently walk to school and another solution is needed that does not involve busing children to another school outside the community. A permanent addition to the existing building or complete rev/ex would allow the community to remain whole and reduce the long-term operational costs of busing.

We support the Superintendent’s recommendation to convene a Tri-Cluster Roundtable Discussion to address the overutilization of elementary schools in the Gaithersburg Cluster and elsewhere. Not to get too far off topic, but we actually think it’s a good idea to include the Quince Orchard Cluster in this discussion. We certainly favor collaboration between the clusters, but Summit Hall needs relief today. Postponing the solution again to a long-standing problem is unacceptable. The students and parents have been patiently waiting for a solution to be proposed, and it is troubling that the timing for that relief is now uncertain.

Quince Orchard Cluster

First off, we are happy to see the Brown Station Elementary rev/ex move forward and we thank you for keeping that on track. We support the QO Cluster requests for needed projects at Quince Orchard High School and Fields Road Elementary.

As you know, Rachel Carson Elementary is overcapacity by more than 375 students this year and already has 11 relocatable classrooms to cope with the situation. The school community has repeatedly expressed that the status quo is unacceptable. The City appreciates that several solutions were considered to address the overutilization of Rachel Carson. However, we respectfully disagree with the recommendation that the addition to Dufief will be a viable long term solution; we believe that a new elementary school should be programmed in this CIP for the Quince Orchard Cluster. We came to this conclusion based on current and historic student generation projections for Carson – Carson’s enrollment is nearly 200 higher than the projection from six years ago – and because we believe there will be additional needs to relieve other QO Cluster schools. Our concern is that enrollment at Carson and in the Cluster will continue to increase at a faster pace than currently projected and exacerbate the problem even further.

Regardless of the solution the Board approves for Carson, the timeline must be revised to address this situation in the current CIP. Another six-plus years of this is unacceptable.
Northwest Cluster


We are very pleased that a classroom addition is scheduled for Diamond Elementary School. The school’s core facilities are inadequate to meet the needs of the current school population. We strongly support the Board’s recommended completion date of 2018 to address this crucial capacity project.

Overall for the City

We recognize the solutions to the overutilization of schools in Gaithersburg are complicated and costly. We come to you and to the County year after year to advocate for our school communities – and we’re always mindful that if we advocate for Project A, it will potentially take away from a worthy Project B.

While MCPS does a fabulous job educating our children, this system for providing facilities is not working. The proposed CIP recommendations are an unsustainable solution to a persistent problem. Building additions on to existing schools can sometimes be an adequate solution, but often it’s only a temporary relief – and ultimately more costly in the long run than programming new schools. We respectfully suggest that MCPS needs to adopt a better way to project long-term needs in order to adequately plan for them.

The time to demand adequate funding for our educational infrastructure – or look to fundamentally change how it is funded - is upon us.

We’re not just saying this, we are trying to proactively help. The City recently created a mechanism within our APFO that will, for the first time, allow us to collect funds from new developments to be earmarked for school facilities projects. While this won’t solve all of our problems, the Council and I feel it’s an important step in assisting your efforts to meet the needs of all students by helping to further contribute funding to our schools.

Gaithersburg continues to be an active partner in improving the situation for our students. While we aren’t involved in the administration of our schools, we have a long and impressive history of educational support and cooperation with MCPS and the Board of Education. We are often recognized for the comprehensive and creative partnership approaches we take in working with you to prepare our youth for their future success.

We join you in advocating for our most precious resource – our youth – and we have made additional school construction funding a priority in the City’s legislative agenda in Annapolis. We ask that every consideration be given to ensure our youth receive the highest quality education possible in facilities that reflect your commitment to excellence.

Thank you for this opportunity to testify before you tonight. Thank you for all you do. I would be pleased to answer any questions.