Showing posts with label cell phone towers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cell phone towers. Show all posts

Monday, January 24, 2022

Tues. Jan. 25th: @mococouncil Votes to Speed Process for Cell Towers in Front Yards AND Lower Fees for Vendors



Dear neighbor,


Tomorrow afternoon (Tuesday, January 25) the County Council is scheduled to vote on two resolutions to:
  1. Speed conditional use hearings  (by restricting resident rights)  for wireless facilities that will be placed very near to homes  and
  2. Lower fees for these applications so as to massively subsidize wireless expansion - at resident/taxpayer expense.
The Council is poised to approve and encourage close proximity wireless antennas in spite of the recent DC Court of Appeals decision (EHT vs FCC) that the FCC has yet to provide a “reasoned explanation” to demonstrate current radio frequency (RF) emission standards are safe.

We need your help TODAY to reach out to the County Council to STOP these onerous resolutions!

MC4T.ORG is working with a broad coalition of Montgomery County organizations that are opposed to these resolutions. Resolutions that are intended to  implement some of the most onerous provisions of ZTA 19-07.

Please use this link to take action and send emails to all Council Members urging that they reject both resolutions.


(The link includes lots more information and a special one-minute tool to make it very easy to contact the Council.)

Please take action today!

And, as always thank you so much for your support!

--
Montgomery County Coalition for the Control of Cell Towers

Friday, July 23, 2021

Opinion: Children Deserve Safety Assurances When It Comes to Cellphone Radiation

 


If new zoning proposals before Montgomery County Council pass, our children and the rest of us may be exposed to levels of radiation that remain untested for their impact on our health and that of the environment.

For 5G and small cell towers, many localities have large setbacks for the new networks. Petaluma, California, has a 500-foot setback. Los Altos, Calif., requires a 500-foot setback from schools.

While the National Toxicology Program shows clear evidence that this radiation can cause cancer and DNA damage, Montgomery County stands poised to allow cell towers closer to homes and schools with minimal restrictions.

Cellphones have become a rite of passage for our children. Most parents believe that cellphones were safety-tested before they came on the market.

We assume that our federal health and environmental agencies regularly review the latest research and ensure that these incredible devices are safe. They do not...

https://www.marylandmatters.org/2021/07/23/opinion-children-deserve-safety-assurances-when-it-comes-to-cellphone-radiation/

Thursday, January 18, 2018

Call MoCo Delegates and tell them: Vote NO! on MC 27-18, Eminent Domain - Expansion of 'Quick Take' Authority

Our representatives in Annapolis will be holding their weekly off-camera Friday morning meeting tomorrow and plan to vote on a late-filed bill, MC27-18, Montgomery County - Eminent Domain - Expansion of 'Quick Take' Authority.' The bill was requested by the chair on behalf of the Montgomery County government. They will meet tomorrow morning at 9:30am.

Your "representatives" in Annapolis have given you less than 24 hours to let them know how you feel. No public hearing process. Quick! Should they make it easier for the county to seize your property? Tick tock.

This is to amend the Constitution so if it makes it through the legislature it would be on the ballot in November.
 
From the bill:
"For the purpose of proposing an amendment to the Maryland Constitution to expand the authority of the County Council of Montgomery County to provide for the immediate taking of private property situated in the County and needed for certain purposes; making stylistic changes; and submitting this amendment to the qualified voters of the State for their adoption or rejection."
 
This would give the County Council authority for quick take on STATE roads which they currently do not have. So yes. This can be for the BRT and for the Beltway projects as well as the Bike plan which will also have to acquire property. Also, small cell towers. The State has a very defined process for taking and it is not quick take.  This would supersede that and the decisions would be made by politicians. Currently county quick take on county roads is limited.
 
Note that no other Maryland County has the ability for quick take on state roads.
Your delegates and their contact information are here. Just think of it as a game show. You have just a few more minutes to press the button. Or in this case, email your delegates. Remember, time's almost up!

Monday, June 30, 2014

The Latest from Wootton HS - no cell tower but possible expansion of the school?

Wootton HS in Rockville Maryland may not be getting a cell tower, but it isn't because the neighbors complained.

No, according to a memo from Superintendent of Schools Josh Starr, the staff in MCPS's own department of Facilities Management also had reservations about the cell tower placement.  The reason - the cell tower would not only take out numerous parking spots, but would pose "potential conflicts between the proposed location and the planned future revitalization and expansion of the school facility."

More students. This sounds as if the expansion is imminent.

Who knew?


Wednesday, May 14, 2014

Growing (cellular) Trees in Rockville

Do you have children in a Rockville public school?

Our wonderful principals are already looking forward to next year, and how to make some cash!

Yes, if your student is at Wootton HS or Julius West MS, your principal has a plan.  Did you know about it?

Both schools will be planting cell phone trees on school property - to make a little cash.

Mark your calendar for May 20 at 7 pm at Wootton HS.  Parents of the Julius West community should attend too - since you are getting a similar deal, and many of you live right across Scott Drive from Wootton and  its lovely tower.

Didn't you know that money is tight?  Despite the County Council fully funding the Superintendent's request, apparently, the principals at JW and Wootton need more cash.  

The solution?  Cell phone trees on school property.

Can they do this?  They think so.

Really?  Haven't we been down this path before at Wootton?  Yes, we have - you can read all about it.

In 2004, the community objected, the project looked a little obtrusive, and the plan was scrapped.  Good thing, because how many of us have cell phone service with Cingular these days?  But now Cingular is part of AT & T and the company has an amazing deal all worked out with Dr. Doran - who has graciously decided to share this amazing deal with Julius West.  You can read about Wootton's deal in Dr. Doran's note below.

So -mark your calendars and attend the May 20 meeting.  Please be sure to ask Dr. Doran the following questions:

1.  When did our lovely Board of Education vote to allow a cell phone tower on the Wootton field?

2.  Who will sign the lease agreement (see #1)

3.  How much does Wootton get?  How much does each feeder school get - remember the cluster has six elementary schools and two middle schools that are part of the cluster).

4.   Who are the commercial vendors who will be part of the lease agreement and how will you check who has access to the school?

5.  Is the tower really going on your brand new artificial turf field?  Or are you thinking about removing some of the surrounding trees (don't even try, its public parkland) or parking spots?

6.  What can you tell us about the back up generators?  How often are they tested?  Do they require fuel delivery?

7.  Will you register the site with the fire department as a HAZMAT location?

8.  What other local permits are required before this plan goes forward?

9.  How many teachers can you hire with the cell phone revenue stream?

While I know Dr. Doran will have ALL the answers at the meeting, you may want to contact him in advance to share your thoughts.  He can be reached at  301-279-8550 or Michael_J_Doran@mcpsmd.org.

We will share information about the JW cell phone project as soon as it is available.




From: "THOMAS S WOOTTON HIGH SCHOOL" 
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 3:30:10 PM
Subject: cell tower

A message from THOMAS S WOOTTON HIGH SCHOOL
Greetings from Wootton…
 We have been approached by AT&T and its contractors about the possibility of having a cell tower installed in our stadium.  We’ve already met with them, as well as the folks from MCPS Real Estate management division.  The school and it’s feeder school would receive a revenue stream for the next 10 years.  With ever-shrinking budgets at every level, this revenue would go a long way in supporting the work we do here at Wootton as well as our excellent feeders.  We’d like to reach out to our community to get your thoughts on the project.  In an effort to do so, we’re holding a  meeting in our media center on 5/20 at 7:00pm  Representatives from AT&T and Site Link Wireless Inc. will be on hand to answer any question regarding this proposal.  Please don’t hesitate to contact my Business Administrator, Philip Hill 301-279-8559,  if you need further information.


Tuesday, March 4, 2014

Cell phone towers collapse in West Virginia, killing 3

A 300-foot cellphone tower collapsed Saturday and minutes later a smaller tower fell, killing two contractors and a firefighter, authorities said.
The contractors were tethered to the larger tower when it collapsed in Clarksburg, State Police Cpl. Mark Waggamon said. A firefighter with the Nutter Fort Fire Department was killed when he was walking from his vehicle to the scene.
Two other contractors working on the larger tower were hurt and taken to a hospital. Waggamon described their injuries as serious but not life-threatening.
Waggamon said three of the workers were more than 60 feet up on the tower. One of those workers was killed along with a co-worker who was about 20 feet up when the tower toppled.
Two other workers at the site were not injured...
 http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/02/02/cell-phone-towers-collapse-in-west-virginia-killing-3/

Thursday, January 30, 2014

Residents want answers about a proposal to put a 180-foot cell tower near Carderock Springs Elementary School.

...Residents have been concerned that the tower, which would be built on state property, is too close to Carderock Springs Elementary School. In a September meeting, residents expressed fears of having a tower that emitted electromagnetic radiation or electromagnetic fields so close to the school, a concern that was dismissed out-of-hand by officials at the meeting...
 http://www.gazette.net/article/20140122/NEWS/140129689/1022/carderock-residents-look-for-answers-from-state-on-proposed-cellphone&template=gazette

Thursday, January 9, 2014

Get the Cell Out - ATL: T-mobile Suing DeKalb to Place Cell Towers Next to...

Get the Cell Out - ATL: T-mobile Suing DeKalb to Place Cell Towers Next to...: Wireless communications firm T-Mobile South has sued DeKalb County a second time. According to the Daily Report Online T-Mobile says its lea...

Monday, October 21, 2013

MCPS Cell Towers Owe $86K in Property Taxes

Cell towers on public school playgrounds represent lost property tax revenue for the State of Maryland.  For 10 years MCPS cell towers escaped paying any property taxes.  It was only after years of advocacy by Louis Wilen that property tax bills were finally issued to the MCPS cell tower telecommunications companies.

However, the bills could only be issued retroactively for 3 years.  So MCPS cell towers escaped paying property taxes for 7 years. 

Now that property tax bills are being issued, let's take a look at which telecommunications companies aren't paying.  Note that when these bills are not paid the State of Maryland can not force a tax sale like they would on a home. Instead, the State must take each of these bills to Court for collection.

The chart below shows which telecommunications companies owe property taxes on their cell towers on MCPS playgrounds. Some of these companies owe 5 years of property taxes.

17,202.24Sprint/NextelRandolph RoadKennedy High School
16,345.63Tower CoEmory Grove RoadWoodwards Road School site
16,342.07Tower CoOld Georgetown RoadTilden Middle School
15,588.20Sprint/NextelEmory Grove RoadWoodwards Road School site
13,693.68ComcastEmory Grove RoadWoodwards Road School site
7,083.86Clear Wireless 12501 Dalewood DriveWheaton High School
178.72Clear Wireless Valley Brook DriveSpringbrook High School
76.92CricketOlney Sandy Spring RoadSherwood High School

TOTAL in over due property tax bills for MCPS cell towers:  $86,511.32

Tuesday, October 15, 2013

Frontline: Cell Tower Deaths

THIS is what you want on your child's playground?

WATCH:  http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/cell-tower-deaths/


Well, this is what Red Zone Schools get on their playground...

Superintendent Starr wants 3 more Red Zone cell towers (shown in image):

Neelsville Middle School
Forest Oak Middle School
Gaithersburg High School


Cell tower compounds have already been installed on playgrounds/fields at the following Montgomery County Public Schools: 

Northwood HS - Silver Spring
Blake HS - Silver Spring
Einstein HS - Silver Spring 
Kennedy HS - Silver Spring
Wheaton HS - Silver Spring 
Springbrook HS - Silver Spring
Blair HS - Silver Spring
Watkins Mill HS - Gaithersburg
Daly Elementary School - Germantown*
Magruder HS - Rockville
Tilden Middle School - Rockville
Sherwood HS - Sandy Spring

Woodwards Road ES site - Gaithersburg

*The Daly ES PTA and community said no to this cell tower and Superintendent Jerry Weast signed the lease and placed the tower on the playground anyway.

Doug Duncan's Milestone Plan Hits Opposition in Anne Arundel County

Former County Executive Doug Duncan's "no brainer" deal isn't going over with Anne Arundel legislators.  They are proposing legislation to stop Duncan's "no brainer" deal.

Plans For Cell Towers At County Schools Come Under Fire

Monday, September 23, 2013

Piney Orchard PTA offers info fair on school cell towers

Got questions or concerns about cellphone towers at Anne Arundel County schools?
...The Piney Orchard Elementary PTA will host an information fair Tuesday [September 24, 2013] on the cellphone tower planned for proposed the school in Odenton.
The school is at 2641 Strawberry Lake Way. The fair begins at 6:30 p.m. and is open to the public.

Friday, September 20, 2013

180-foot tower would be too close to Carderock Springs Elementary School, residents say

...But residents said they feared having a tower that emitted electromagnetic radiation or electromagnetic fields so close to Carderock Springs Elementary School, a concern dismissed out-of-hand by officials...


http://www.gazette.net/article/20130918/NEWS/130919048/1124/carderock-residents-balk-at-state-x2019-s-cell-tower-proposal&template=gazette

Thursday, September 19, 2013

Cell Towers at Schools Found to be Out of Compliance

San Marino Tribune:  Cell Towers Need Permits
Verizon Wireless must receive a retroactive condition use permit, or CUP, from the City of San Marino for a cell phone tower that was constructed in December, 2005 at the maintenance yard near Valentine Elementary and Huntington Middle Schools but never received proper certification...
...It was later determined that State approval is needed if the tower could land on school property if it fell or was knocked over. The tower at Huntington and Valentine could land on school property if it were to fall or be knocked to the ground and will need retroactive DSA approval...

Wednesday, September 18, 2013

Legislation could derail Anne Arundel plan for school cell towers - CapitalGazette.com: Government

Legislation could derail Anne Arundel plan for school cell towers - CapitalGazette.com: Government
County Councilman Jamie Benoit, D-Crownsville, introduced legislation Monday that would bar companies from building free-standing cell phone towers on public school property in Anne Arundel County. Bill No. 78-13 also would restrict cell phone towers to beyond 500 feet of a dwelling.

Thursday, September 5, 2013

Lawmakers question effort to evaluate Arundel school sites for cell towers

Anne Arundel County public schools' agreement last year to allow school properties to be evaluated as possible sites for cellphone towers has drawn a mix of support and opposition from some residents.
This week, some elected officials representing an area considered for a tower — Piney Orchard Elementary — chimed in as well, suggesting that the school board terminate its lease with Milestone Communications, a Virginia-based independent tower developer that is performing the evaluations.


Read more: http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/anne-arundel/odenton/bs-md-ar-cell-tower-aacps-20130905,0,7328235.story#ixzz2e48zggkN

Tuesday, August 27, 2013

Public Comment to State Board of Ed: Illegal Fees, Charter School, Restrictions on Teachers, Cell Towers on Playgrounds

The following public comment was given today to the 

Maryland State Board of Education
August 27, 2013

Public School Students Should Be First Priority
 of State Board of Education


1. Montgomery County Public School students are still paying fees to attend public school classes. This is the third time I have come before you on these illegal fees. In 2010, the State Board of Education did a survey of Maryland public schools to determine if other Counties were charging students to attend public school classes. What did you do with your survey results? You know this illegal practice continues, yet you remain silent.

2. Seven students were admitted to Montgomery County Public Schools one and only public charter school without being part of the public lottery process. You were given this information as part of your evaluation of the Charter. Have you contacted the seven families from the wait list that were denied admission to this school to alert them of their right to appeal the denial of admission? Have you done anything to protect the right of these seven public school students to a fair and open public lottery process?

3. How many teachers in public schools in Maryland are in classrooms with restrictions on their ability to touch or interact with their students? Please do a county by county survey and make the results public. Parents need to know if they are required to send their child to a public school if the classroom teacher is restricted from tying a shoelace, touching a child to show how to hold a pencil, or picking a child up who has fallen down. Parents have the right to know if their child's teacher is restricted from taking these basic actions. Do we need regulations? Legislation?

What needs to be done to make sure that no teachers are in classrooms with children with these unconscionable restrictions on their movements. If a teacher has such restrictions, then promote them to administration and get them out of the public school classrooms! NOW!

Clearly, the State Board knew there was a serious problem when you signed off on your September 2012 Opinion 12-34, Picca v. Montgomery County Board of Education, but did you take any action? Here's what you said in that 2012 Opinion:

September 25, 2012, Opinion from the Maryland State Board of Education in the Picca v. Montgomery County Board of Education matter :

"...Recent child sex abuse cases have shone a bright light in that dark corner.  We think that this case can shine a light on the abusive conduct, albeit infrequent, of school staff toward children.  We ask local boards to review and put in place a policy addressing teacher and staff conduct with students, and make it a part of the message in staff training and meetings.  We ask local boards to inquire about the safeguards that are in place to assure that the type of persistent conduct that occurred in this case does not occur in their schools..."

Did MCPS take any action after that Opinion was released?

It appears that neither the State Board of Education, nor Montgomery County Public Schools took any action after the September 2012 Opinion because it took HOMELAND SECURITY to remove this teacher from a MCPS classroom in February of 2013.

According to court documents, school leaders placed restrictions on Joynes in November 2011, after two complaints. Joynes was told not to touch children, be alone with them, sit in the cafeteria during lunch or stay on the playground during recess. His classroom door was to remain open, and he was to use staff restrooms, not those for students, documents say.

The Washington Post, August 21, 2013 – Article attached.


4. We need a Statewide ban on cell towers at elementary schools. Parents and guardians need to focus on their children's education and should not have to spend these important educational years battling private interests who want to turn playgrounds into Hazardous Materials compounds. It's time to protect playgrounds for public school students!

Thank you for the opportunity to give public comment.



Janis Zink Sartucci
Parents' Coalition of Montgomery County, Maryland