Dedicated to improving responsiveness and performance of Montgomery County Public Schools
Monday, April 3, 2023
Councilmembers Friedson and Luedtke want to eliminate advocacy for the public in zoning and land use decisions, want advocacy of OPC to be shut out of zoning decisions. #OfficeofPeoplesCounsel
Wednesday, November 30, 2022
Montgomery County urges justices to deny religious burden claim
Burtonsville Associates and Burtonsville Crossing LLC allege the county essentially blocked construction of the church in violation of the federal Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act by refusing to alter its master plan and extend sewer service to the planned building, as it had done for a secular facility.
Montgomery County, in its responsive high court filing, said Congress enacted RLUIPA to prohibit government from imposing a substantial burden on religious exercise through land use restrictions.
Lawmakers, however, did not require counties to make special accommodations for religious facilities in land use decisions, as that would violate the constitutional prohibition on governmental establishment of religion, wrote the county’s lead attorney, Howard R. Feldman.
He added that the county’s decision to stick with its master plan on sewer service did not substantially burden the church’s religious exercise because a septic system would still enable the church to have an 800-seat facility rather than its preference for one that would accommodate 2,000 congregants...
Montgomery County urges Supreme Court to deny religious burden claim (thedailyrecord.com)
Sunday, September 11, 2016
Floreen's Zoning Amendment Research Riddled with Errors, Cites Mark Twain, Cites Secret Agreement, Says ALL MoCo Homes are Identical
The research Packet that Nancy Floreen relies on to support her position was written by Council staff and is riddled with errors. Below is a corrected copy of the Packet so that Councilmembers can vote on this major zoning change with accurate and focused background information.
As a reminder, the cell towers that are the subject of Floreen's zoning change will blanket neighborhoods and schools. They will be located at school bus stops, on sidewalks and at intersections. The public's review of the size, location and style of these cell towers is critical to the safety of County neighborhoods.
Citations to Mark Twain and secret "verbal agreements" hardly seem useful in a document meant to provide factual, relevant background information to elected officials making a decision to change County zoning laws.
Red markings and pink highlighting are our edits to this document.
We also substituted maps with WHITE DOTS to show exactly where these cell towers will be located in three neighborhoods. The maps provided by Council Staff were difficult to read.
Wednesday, July 13, 2016
Floreen wants Cell Towers in Front Yards
Tuesday, December 16, 2014
"Mayor and Council are acting in good faith, are acting with the protection of students in mind"
At issue now is a proposed Zoning Text Amendment(ZTA) that would prohibit self-storage as a use in several zoning classifications in the city if it is within 250ft of a public School.
http://keepourschoolsandneighborhoodssafe.wordpress.com/2014/12/16/siena-corporation-threatens-to-sue-the-city-again/
Tuesday, December 17, 2013
Dec. 19th: 6 Room Addition for Arcola Elem. School before Planning Board
WHEATON, Arcola Elementary School Addition, Mandatory Referral for request to build a 6 classroom, two-story addition, on 5 acres in R-90 Zone at 1820 Franwall Ave
Friday, December 3, 2010
MoCo Planning Board wants Significant Density Increases
Former Planning Board member Meredith Wellington has written the article below, out of concern for the direction of the new zoning ordinance. She suggests if you are concerned please contact the county council, and the Planning Board. To contact the Council, go here. The chair of the Planning Board is Francoise Carrier. To contact Ms. Carrier, go here.
Montgomery County MD Zoning Rewrite ZAP Article Residential Zone Proposals
Saturday, February 20, 2010
Time to Speak Up on Commercial/Residential (CR) Zone
Dear Friends,
It is time to speak up again about the CR zone. The Full Council took it up yesterday, and is supposed to have its final vote next Tuesday, February 23rd in the afternoon. In a three and a half hour work session, it became clear that the CR zone is inferior to existing zones, and that it carries with it a serious set of problems, as explained in the attached memo. We ask that you send an email to Nancy Floreen, Council President (Councilmember.Floreen@montgomerycountymd.gov)--it should arrive no later than COB on Monday, February 22-- that includes some of the following ideas:
The CR zone should be rejected because it is untimely, untested, legally deficient, overly complex, and contrary to Montgomery County’s tradition of public participation. Further, it is a “one size fits all” zone when, in fact, one size does not fit all in communities as different as White Flint, Kensington, and Takoma/Langley. The imposition of the zone throughout the entire County will result in fewer significant public benefits throughout, and, in certain parts of the County, little, if any, benefits at all. Please reject this zone, and look to existing zones, like the TMX, that do not have the problems currently found in the CR zone.
Please feel free to forward this to other civic organizations.
Thanks very much,
Meredith Wellington