The following flyer is being distributed by PTA's in Montgomery County, Maryland. It shows the county wide PTA organization (MCCPTA) as a sponsor of a teachers union (MCEA), support personnel union (SEIU), and administrator union's (MCAASP) rally on April 6, 2010, at the Montgomery County Council building in Rockville, Maryland.
The flyer shows that it was authored by Tom Israel. Tom Israel is the Executive Director of the Montgomery County Education Association (MCEA). The flyer lists school related services that will be eliminated if $137 million is cut from the proposed MCPS budget. Where did that list come from? When the Board of Education met earlier this week Superintendent Jerry Weast reported that no decisions had been made about what would be cut from the FY11 proposed MCPS Operating Budget.
"promises to try to protect programs-- despite a budget $137 million less than what the Board of Education requested. He says the school system will work to avoid furloughs."
Is it required that the cuts listed on the union/PTA flyer would happen if $137 million was cut from the MCPS proposed budget? No.
Could $137 million be cut from the MCPS proposed budget without impacting classrooms? Yes.
Is anyone looking closely at the MCPS budget and evaluating options in light of the dire financial situation our county finds itself in?
What could be trimmed without impacting the educational experience for our students?
Any suggestions?
April6flyer Correction to flyer: Please note that the administrator's union is actually the Montgomery County Association of Administrative and Supervisory Personnel (MCAASP).
The Parents' Coalition of Montgomery County, Maryland seeks to achieve the goals of coherent, content-rich curriculum standards; high expectations combined with timely remediation and acceleration; a wider range of educational options for parents and children; greater transparency and accountability; and meaningful community input.
Contact us at: contact@parentscoalitionmc.com
Former Inspector General Thomas Dagley
"Montgomery County would benefit from a cultural change that encourages residents and employees to ask tough questions on difficult issues — and forces leaders to answer."
"Along the way, you’ve had a challenging relationship with the Parents’ Coalition, the network of citizen activists who use the political process and other means to hold MCPS accountable.
The thing people accuse me of is listening, but not hearing. I hear, but I do not always agree. I am sorry that the world is faster than it was 10 years ago. I did not do that. [But] if we do not keep up, then our kids will be behind. We have to stop whining and get real."
Bethesda Magazine, March-April 2011
What the Washington Post said about the Parents' Coalition
The coalition might be the best-known parent advocacy group in the region. Its members represent several constituencies, including parents of special education and gifted education students and fiscal watchdogs. The group's defining victory came this school year when the school system scaled back the fees charged to families for course materials.
Coalition leaders have drawn attention to the misuse of funds collected from students for activities, the broadcast of a commercial radio service on school buses and, with their "Weast Watch" blog, the travel habits of Weast and his lieutenants.
Tip: Include the word "minutes" in your search keywords to focus your search on BOE minutes. But note that the search function on the MCPS website has been broken by a redesign on the site by the MCPS Public Information Office. It is no longer possible to restrict your search to just Board of Education minutes.
The MCCPTA sponsorship lends its name to the rally as a show of support for the teachers and discouragement of cuts on general principle.
ReplyDeleteNo other resources were requested.
The 44-28 vote to lend the MCCPTA name was preceded by dissenting voices concerned that the rally made no mention about children's best interests.
Thanks for the information.
ReplyDeleteSo this flyer should actually say "44 PTA members sponsor this rally"?
There are 189 local PTAs in Montgomery County, yet only 44 votes were cast to support this rally? Not even 25% of the PTAs?
Were local PTAs given the chance to vote on this "sponsorship" or was this just an on the spot vote at a MCCPTA meeting?
MCCPTA is listed first on the flyer, so it clearly a primary sponsor.