Friday, September 24, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Dedicated to improving responsiveness and performance of Montgomery County Public Schools
The coalition might be the best-known parent advocacy group in the region. Its members represent several constituencies, including parents of special education and gifted education students and fiscal watchdogs. The group's defining victory came this school year when the school system scaled back the fees charged to families for course materials.
Coalition leaders have drawn attention to the misuse of funds collected from students for activities, the broadcast of a commercial radio service on school buses and, with their "Weast Watch" blog, the travel habits of Weast and his lieutenants.
The Washington Post, June 4, 2009
Tip: Include the word "minutes" in your search keywords to focus your search on BOE minutes. But note that the search function on the MCPS website has been broken by a redesign on the site by the MCPS Public Information Office. It is no longer possible to restrict your search to just Board of Education minutes.
Teaching for dollars assumes that teachers will be motivated to better educate students if they are to receive extra compensation. By definition this should reward over-achieving teachers and it should encourage under-achieving teachers to perform better. The fact that this reward system has been shown to be ineffective in Tennessee does not mean that teaching for dollars is ineffective as it has had success elsewhere. The experiments in Tennessee need to be checked for the actual testing and validation methods for student improvement. In most companies it is management's responsibility to motivate employees and to keep them motivated. Some people are not motivated by money, and we can hope that teachers also posses a passion for education. This may also confound merit based pay studies. In the book Freakonomics, teachers were critiqued based on the improvements of individual students from year to year. Every student has different abilities so it may not be fair to judge solely based on test scores. Students typically showed improvement from year to year on standardized tests. For teachers that excelled, their would be an extra improvement in their test scores. This improvement would then persist in following years. For teachers that falsified test scores, the improvements would fall back to normal in subsequent years. Additional problems arise because their is dispute on the efficacy of standardized tests in general and the worry that teachers must "teach to the test" instead of worrying about other foundational skills. Merit based pay is a complex issue, and it is not clear that it is a solution, but finding ways to motivate teachers and keep them motivated is the answer. The question is how can we make sure that administrators are able to motivate them?
ReplyDeleteJ.F. Lesoine