Initially, Board members and Apple Ballot endorsed candidates Pat O'Neill and Judy Docca moved to affirm the Superintendent's decision. Board member Brenda Wolff agreed with that motion.
However, the rest of the Board of Education did not agree and instead moved to affirm the suspension but reverse the decision to allow the student to return to their home school.
The public does not know what this case involved. Did this case involve a victim? Did this decision force an offender to move instead of telling the victim to find a new school?
https://go.boarddocs.com/mabe/mcpsmd/Board.nsf/files/BMET5874F709/$file/200310%20Report%20of%20Previous%20Closed%20Session.pdf
It seems that all their pompous formality has obscured the stark reality.
ReplyDeleteWhat does reverse, in part, mean?
ReplyDelete