Showing posts with label PIA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label PIA. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 16, 2025

Follow-Up Annual Meeting for Maryland Public Information Act Compliance Board

The Maryland Public Information Act (PIA) Compliance Board will hold a follow-up to its annual meeting by videoconference on Friday, September 19, 2025, at 3:00 p.m.  The meeting will be held virtually by Microsoft Teams. The public is invited to attend.  You can find the 

agenda here.

 

Join the meeting now

Meeting ID: 210 844 105 087 6

Passcode: jQ6Lf3uy

 

Dial in by phone

+1 443-529-0364,,599307034# United States, Baltimore

Find a local number

Phone conference ID: 599 307 034#

 

If you have any issues accessing the agenda, please email piaopengov@oag.state.md.us or call (410) 576-6560 to receive a copy.  For additional information about this open meeting of the Board, please contact Kentiara Moore or Teena Hallameyer, Administrative Officers, at piaopengov@oag.state.md.us, or call (410) 576-6560.

If you have trouble joining by video or audio on the day of the meeting, please call (410) 576-6560, or email piaopengov@oag.state.md.us.

Wednesday, September 25, 2024

Friday, Sept. 27th: MD Public Information Act Compliance Board Annual Meeting

The PIA Compliance Board will hold its second annual meeting by videoconference on Friday, September 27, 2024, at 1:00 p.m.  The purpose of this meeting is to finalize the Board’s Annual Report.  The meeting will be held virtually by Microsoft Teams. The public is invited to attend.

 

Join on your computer, mobile app or room device

Click here to join the meeting

Meeting ID: 266 506 582 13

Passcode: QQsA9S

 

Join by phone (audio only)

+1 443-529-0364,,755685150# United States, Baltimore (one-click dial)

Phone Number: 443-529-0364

Conference ID: 755 685 150#

If you have trouble joining by video or phone on the day of the meeting, please call (410) 576-6560, or email piaopengov@oag.state.md.us.

 

The meeting agenda is being uploaded to the Board’s website. To request a copy of the agenda or for additional information about this open meeting of the Board, please contact S. Spencer Dove, Administrative Officer, at piaopengov@oag.state.md.us, or call (410) 576-6560.

 

Note: this meeting was originally scheduled for Friday, September 20, 2024, at 1pm. However, because the Board did not reach a quorum, the meeting was not held and no business conducted.

Saturday, May 27, 2017

What it looks like when a Board of Education Member Talks with Parents #CellTowers #AdminLeave #Volunteerism #NotMoCo

This is not happening in Montgomery County, this is Prince George's County.




Prince George's County School Board Member to host meetings on Administrative Leave, Volunteerism and Cell Towers. 

Link is here

Roundtable Discussions on PGCPS Schools 


  • Administrative Leave on Saturday, May 27th at 9:30am


  • Volunteerism (Background Checks, Fingerprinting and Training) on Tuesday, May 30th at 6:30pm


  • Cell Towers on Thursday, June 1 at 6:30pm

Monday, July 25, 2016

Exclusive: BOE Spends $75,600 Fighting 1 Child. BOE would rather Litigate than Educate. BOE has No Idea how many Hours Atty Spends on Each Case. #waste #irresponsible

2016 MD State Legislative Audit of MCPS
The Maryland State Office of Legislative Affairs has flagged the Board of Education's contract with an outside attorney for failing to determine if the billing arrangement "obtained the best value".

The media has not reported on the 2016 State Audit of the Montgomery County Public School system, but the Parents' Coalition did follow up on this issue flagged by the Auditor.  We have obtained invoices from the Board of Education's outside attorney who handles special education litigation from October 2015 through May 2016.


These invoices show that the outside attorney handling Board of Education special education litigation never accounts for the hours spent on a case unless the matter goes to Federal Court.

The billing arrangement that the Board of Education has approved with this outside attorney enables the attorney to take a minimum fee of $3,150 on every case set to go before an Administrative Law JudgeEven if a case is immediately withdrawn or settled, the minimum fee is $3,150.

If a case goes before an Administrative Law Judge for a hearing, the fee is then based on how long the attorney can extend the proceeding.  One day before a Judge earns a $6,300 fee, no matter how much time was actually expended on the case prior to the day of the hearing.

The $6,300 daily fee equates to 26 hours of time based on this attorney's billing rate of $245.

Every day spent before a Judge, earns the attorney another 26 hours of fees, regardless of how many hours have actually been spent on the case.   

In this set of bills we see the following days charged on non-Federal Court matters.  On non-Federal Court matters, from October through April (7 months) this attorney billed the Board of Education for the equivalent of 904 hours or 23 weeks of full-time work.  We know this attorney represents other public school systems in Maryland.

Is the Montgomery County Board of Education obtaining the "best value" for these education dollars?  

Here is a list of the cases shown on the invoices obtained by the Parents' Coalition. For each case (shown by #), we have grouped together the charges shown on the invoices below.  We have divided up the charges by the hourly rate of $245 to shown how many hours would have to have been billed to have earned the charges shown.  The Board of Education has no idea if the charges shown on the invoices are justified, as the BOE does not require the attorney to actually detail the hours spent on each case.  

2015 October  Case withdrawn #29318       $3,150   = 13 hours

2015 October  Attend 1 day   #31838         $6,300    =  26 hours
2015 November 1/2 day         #31838         $3,150    =  13 hours   Total = 39 hours

2015 November  6 1/2 days #28847           $34,650    =  141 hours
2015 December   1 day        #28847             $6,300    =   26 hours
2016 January     4 days        #28847           $25,200    =  103 hours  Total = 270 hours

2015 December    1/2 day    #36487              $3,150     =  13 hours

2015 December    4 days      #35653             $25,200    = 103 hours
2016 January        3 days      #35653             $18,900    = 77 hours   Total = 180 hours

2016 February    Case withdrawn #18051       $3,150    = 13 hours

2016 February    4 days       #41442            $25,200   = 103 hours
2016 March        4 days       #41442             $25,200  = 103 hours
2016 April           4 days      #41442             $25,200  = 103 hours  Total = 309 hours

2016 March      Case withdrawn #05236        $3,150 = 13 hours

2016 March      Case withdrawn #07725        $3,150 = 13 hours

2016 March      Case withdrawn #05278        $3,150 = 13 hours

2016 March      Case withdrawn # 04604       $3,150 = 13 hours

2016 April        Case withdrawn  #08826       $3,150 = 13 hours





Saturday, October 11, 2014

WPost Supports BOE Candidates that will Not Protect Children #enoughabuse

The Washington Post has released their list of endorsements for the upcoming Board of Education election on November 4, 2014.
The Washington Post tells voters they should re-elect the current Board members who are on the ballot.

That's great advice if you don't care about the sexual abuse of children by MCPS staff.

If you care about public school children and keeping them safe in MCPS classrooms then you will vote out the current Board of Education members for their failure to take any action to protect students from sexual abuse by MCPS staff. 

What have the current Board members done on this issue?  Absolutely nothing. 

The current Board of Education Policy on child abuse is 26 YEARS out of date

The current Board members have not reviewed this Policy, discussed this Policy, or done anything to address the numerous arrests of MCPS staff in the last few years.  

This out of date Policy is used to TRAIN INCOMING TEACHERS. 

The Policy is 26 YEARS out of date.

It does not reflect current Maryland law!
What kind of Board of Education members sit by and let this happen?

Thursday, March 6, 2014

Board of Education Member Patricia O'Neill's Civility Theme

by Frederick Stichnoth 
February 20, 2014
While there are “no easy answers,” MCPS Board member Pat O’Neill hopes that a committee, this time the cybercivility task force, “can help put civility back in society.” She believes that “even if you disagree with me, or disagree with the board, there is a civil approach to discourse.”
During her immediately prior term on the Board, as it considered parents’ access to committee (then school improvement team) participation, Pat also had the strong opinion that parents should be civil to schools – so strong, actually, that she suggested committees should not include “the PIAs, the pain in the ass people in the school….” She got quite a bit of attention for her “graphic” and “candid” (as Mike Durso puts it) treatment back at parents.
Board member Chris Barclay agreed: committees look for “team players.”
Watch the video: it’s both amusing and instructive. You can really see some differences between Board members, back then.
Pat O’Neill has been on the Board for four terms -- 15 years -- and she’s running again! Chris will hold down his seat on the Board while he runs to step up to the Council.
Marx said that historic facts and personages appear twice -- the first time as tragedy, the second time as farce.
---------------
2009 Video: http://parentscoalitionmc.blogspot.com/2009/05/oneill-no-pain-in-ass-parents.html?m=1 [Minute 8:50 for Patricia O'Neill comment]
Marcus Moore, Parents, members of school board debate derogatory comment. Gazette. May 20, 2009http://ww2.gazette.net/stories/05202009/montnew180211_32530.shtml 
Daniel de Vise and Miranda S. Spivack. Parents take pride in new moniker, The Washington Post. May 21, 2009. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/05/20/AR2009052001900.html 
Lindsay A. Powers. MCPS form ‘cybercivility’ task force. Gazette. February 19, 2014.http://www.gazette.net/article/20140214/NEWS/140219409&template=gazette 
Obligatory memorandum. http://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/boe/meetings/agenda/2008-09/2009-0512/7.1%20Policy%20AEB.pdf 
Board minutes, pages 20 – 25 (no PIA). http://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/boe/meetings/minutes/2009/051209.min.pdf 
Summary of comments on draft Policy AEB (“respectful” and “professional”?):http://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/boe/meetings/agenda/2008-09/2009-0310/10.0%20AEB%20final%20action.pdf 
My May 18, 2009 Parents Coalition post (respectful and professional?):https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/Parents_Coalition/conversations/messages/17982

Monday, May 14, 2012

Open Meetings Massachusetts Style

Here is an interesting news item brought to you from one of my favorite MCPS alums, who continues to follow this blog from a distance.

Massachusetts is trying to put some meat into its Open Meetings Act

Imagine.  A $1000 fine every time a public body violates the Open Meetings Act. 

The problem with the Maryland Open Meetings Act is the lack of a remedy.  Sure, the Montgomery County Board of Education and other public bodies look pretty foolish when they keep on violating the act.  Press coverage helps to let the public know how their tax dollars are working - or rather, not working.

Martha Coakley wants to put more substance into the Massachusetts Open Meetings Act, and is proposing to issue fines of $1000 for every violation.

Here is the text of Ms. Coakley's proposal. 

Massachusetts Definition of Intentional Violation Regulation A special thanks to my source who obviously learned about civic engagement when he was enrolled in MCPS.

Friday, March 9, 2012

"...chilling effect on public participation"

Below is the text of the letter that was sent to the Montgomery County Planning Board concerning statements made by the Planning Director in a local magazine article.  
The Montgomery County Planning Board did, in fact, make a statement regarding this incident on March 8, 2012.. 
March 4,2012
Chairman Francoise Carrier and Planning Board Members, Montgomery County Planning Board,  8787 Georgia Avenue, Silver Spring, MD 20901 
Dear Chairman Carrier and Members of the Montgomery County Planning Board: 
We are writing to provide you with a copy of a letter that we sent to Steve Hull, editor of Bethesda Magazine, on March 2, 2012, in which we take strong exception to statements made by Rollin Stanley, the Director of Planning, that appear in the article “The Future is Looking UP” in the March/April 2012 issue. Mr. Hull has already agreed to publish our letter to the editor in its entirety in the May/June issue of his magazine. 
In this letter, we ask the Board to take certain actions in light of these statements by Mr. Stanley. In the article, Mr. Stanley is clearly speaking in his capacity as the Director of Planning, and he appears to bespeaking on behalf of the Planning Board itself when he characterizes us as “rich white women,” who “spread fear” and “sow discord”, who “stalk” him in his appearances before community groups, and who describe ourselves as members of a “coven.” 
Through these remarks, Mr. Stanley has impugned our integrity,attacked our credibility, and damaged our personal and professional reputations. We ask the Planning Board to publicly disavow his remarks.We also ask that the Board additionally state in open session its policy—as well as the policy it has adopted for its employees—with respect to Board and staff comments about the public and the public’s participation in matters before the Board.
Further, we believe that these remarks raise a serious question as to Mr.Stanley’s fitness to continue to serve as Director of Planning in this County, inasmuch as a substantial part of his job is interfacing with County residents who have concerns about their own property, or about what is going to happen to properties near them. 
We believe that his printed remarks are wholly inconsistent with his responsibility to treat all citizens of Montgomery County with respect,and to recognize that in Montgomery County—unlike other places—there is a strong tradition of public participation in land use issues. Mr.Stanley’s job is to foster public participation, not to work actively to discourage it by using his position to verbally abuse County residents in public simply because they have the temerity to question current efforts to “urbanize” the County. 
We are very concerned that Mr. Stanley’s remarks will have a chilling effect on public participation. They suggest there is a culture that is developing within the Planning Board staff in which citizen participation is neither welcome nor even tolerated. Even in a welcoming environment it is difficult for the uninitiated citizen to plunge into the world of land use, and to testify and/or write with questions and concerns. When citizens must be concerned about personal attacks or dismissive contempt for different points of view when participating before the Planning Board, they will think twice before participating. 
Finally, what message is Mr. Stanley sending to the planners who work under him in terms of how Commission employees should treat the public? What kind of training are young planners receiving in terms of answering questions from the public, providing materials to the public,and explaining to the public the processes of the Planning Board to the residents of Montgomery County?
All of these are matters of great gravity if the Planning Board is to maintain the public’s trust in the integrity of Montgomery County’s land use processes. 
We thus respectfully ask the Board to address the issues publicly, and specifically Mr. Stanley’s comments in the Bethesda Magazine article, at your earliest convenience. It is critical that this matter be put behind us, so that all County residents can once again feel free to voice their views on critical land use planning issues to the Planning Board and its staff. 
Sincerely,
Pat Baptiste 
Meredith Wellington 
Julie Davis 
Jenny Sue Dunner

Wednesday, November 3, 2010

IN: Weast, OUT: "PIAs"

The election results are in and Superintendent Weast or his clone can stay on in MCPS. 

If you are a parent, take note. While the Board of Education and MCPS will beg parents to "get involved" in their child's education, yesterday's election continues the policy that only certain parents will be permitted to get involved in their local schools. "PIA's" can stay home. 


Gazette: Montgomery school board incumbents complete a clean election sweep
All four incumbents on the Montgomery County Board of Education were on the way to victory by wide margins at the polls Tuesday, with 16 percentage points the smallest lead as of 11 p.m...
...With the four incumbents returning, the odds increase that Superintendent of Schools Jerry D. Weast's successor will follow his policies and share his objectives. Candidates said several times that one of the top priorities facing the school system is replacing Weast, who announced his retirement from the school system's top job. He has been superintendent since 1999.
O'Neill and other board members were criticized by some for their inability or unwillingness to differ from Weast on key policy issues. Challengers also criticized the school system's handling of special education students and fiscal transparency and efficiency.


Direct link to Board of Education member Patricia O'Neill's PIA parent comment here.  

Sunday, June 6, 2010

MCPS cancels Helen Thomas

Journalist Helen Thomas was scheduled to be the graduation speaker at Walt Whitman High School later this month -- until Sunday, when she was disinvited after comments that she made about Israel and Palestine made many in the community uncomfortable, Montgomery Board of Education President Patricia O'Neill said Sunday.
"We became aware that there are some unfortunate comments from her that are airing on YouTube," O'Neill said. O'Neill said that especially given the large Jewish population at Whitman, the school was not comfortable with having Thomas speak at the graduation on June 14...

Friday, May 7, 2010

"Livid" President Pat O'Neill

Montgomery council stands ground on cuts to schools | Washington Examiner
...A livid Pat O'Neill, president of the school board, explained that extra cuts could increase the risk of a $52 million penalty from the state for not meeting minimum funding requirements. 
"We're looking at $52 million on top of $138 million and the $30 million that the council is now asking," she said. The $138 million cut "is our line in the sand. We're not crossing that line without a fight."
(Note that the "penalty" that Board of Education President is so concerned about was "waived" this year by the legislature. There is nothing that says another penalty can't also be waived.)

Tuesday, March 30, 2010

CBS: Bullying "Not Just a Part of Growing Up"


Expert Says Expressing "Utter Contempt" for Others Is Learned Behavior, and Schools Must Be Safe Harbor for Students

"I think some of the schools actually did," Coloroso said, "but my concern when I went back and talked to the kids and then talked in the community meeting was, again, going back to those three P's - how important it is that we don’t just write bullying off as 'Boys will be boys, girls just want to be mean, it's part of growing up.' 
"It’s not like a conflict - it's about utter contempt for another human being," Coloroso said. "And it's so important that we stop that in its tracks." 
She said there are three groups that need to be part of ending bullying: "The kids themselves, because bullying [often] happens under the radar of adults; the parents, because you have to be taught to put somebody outside of your circle of caring and make them an 'it' so you so can do anything to them and not feel any shame or compassion; and school officials. We have as educators a legal obligation to keep our schools safe for everyone." 

Wednesday, January 13, 2010

Takoma Voice: Better Schools, in a Bad Budget

School Scene - Seven Resolutions for the New Decade
by Sue Katz Miller


The end of a decade provides a crucial opportunity to “stop and think,” in the immortal words of one school anti-bullying program. Every year at this time, Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS) Superintendent Jerry Weast asks for half of the county budget for our schools. This year, huge shortfalls are predicted in the wake of the recession, and Weast has, as he does each year, threatened painful cuts designed to stimulate parent demands for full funding of his proposed schools budget.

But some of us have lost patience with what appears to be emotional manipulation in order to fund a budget heavy on central office expenses...

...So as the new decade dawns, I am rolling out my seven suggested resolutions for our school system. Honoring most of these resolutions would not require big bucks. What is required: political will, and the will to truly listen to teachers, parents and students.

Read Ms. Katz's seven suggested resolutions here.
This article has been posted twice to the Parents' Coalition blog, we really want you to read it!

Monday, September 28, 2009

20% Drop Sports after 50% Fee Increase

What happened after the MCPS Board of Education unanimously approved Board member Patricia O'Neill's resolution in 2007 to increase the Extracurricular Activity Fee from $20 to $30?

On Thursday, September 24, 2009 The Washington Post ran a story with an upbeat title: More Than Ever, Students Are Playing High School Sports. The article began:
Reporting on its data from the 2008-09 school year, the National Federation of State High School Associations says participation in high school sports, among boys and girls, increased to a new high -- the 20th consecutive year that number has risen. The federation lauded it as high school sports' ability to thrive in spite of the nation's struggling economy.
But tucked in this sports article was a devastating statistic for Montgomery County Public Schools, showing the opposite is happening here.
According to a source at Montgomery County public schools, however, sports participation in Montgomery dropped in 2008-09, down nearly 20 percent from 2007-08... Furthermore, the source said the number of students who received a waiver of the county's $30 athletic participation fee tripled from the previous year.
(According to the MCPS website there is no "waiver" of the $30 activity fee as the article suggests. Rather, if a family makes under $35,000 the fee is reduced to $15.)
How did 20% of our students drop out of sports activities without a peep from the Board of Education or from Superintendent Weast?

What happened? We know what happened. On February 13, 2007, Board of Education member Patricia O'Neill made a motion to raise the MCPS Extracurricular Activity Fee from $20 to $30 to fund JV Lacrosse, a sport that was a favorite of her children.

The resolution, shown below, passed without discussion at the same meeting where it was introduced. There was no opportunity for public notification, discussion or comment. There was also no evaluation of what a 50% increase in the Extracurricular Activity Fee would mean to student participation in after school activities. MCPS requires that this fee be paid by students who participate in any after school activities.

The MCPS Board of Education, in an apparent oblivious haze, assumed that all MCPS families would continue to pay the activity fee no matter what the cost. That didn't happen.

  • The first year (2007-08) of the new fee showed an immediate drop in student activity participation. The $405,000 revenue increase the Board had planned for was off by $159,000. Thousands of students dropped after school activities the first year of the fee increase.
  • By the second year (2008-09) of the fee increase 20% of the students dropped out of after school activities, according to the Washington Post article. That could mean a staggering 8,000 to 9,000* Montgomery County children no longer participate in after school programs at MCPS middle and high schools.
  • We are now in year three (2009-10) of this fee increase. How many MCPS students will be participating in after school activities this year?
UPDATE: NBCSports.com's Bob Cook reports on Montgomery County Public Schools drop in student after school sports participation in his story Will pay-to-play in school sports keep kids on the sidelines?

ECA



*Update 10/14/09: Detailed data on after-school sports participation and ECA fee reduction requests has been requested from MCPS.  We will update as soon as we receive that information. 

Wednesday, July 29, 2009

80 year old banned from MCPS school

The Gazette reports on an 80 year old neighbor that has been banned from stepping foot on the grounds of Kennedy High School in Silver Spring, Maryland. Apparently, Boardmember O'Neill's exclusion of PIA parents extends to neighbors as well.

...In March, fed up with students leaving litter in her English Orchard Court neighborhood in Silver Spring, Cook carried a bag of the garbage into the high school and unceremoniously dumped it in the lobby. She believed she was returning the contents to their their rightful owners.
Her neighborhood is used as a shortcut by students going to and from fast-food restaurants for lunch and between after-school activities.

"This had been a long-term problem for the past year," said Cook, who headed up the local homeowners association until July when her term expired. "I could never get anyone to respond to me."

...After the March incidents, the principal, Thomas Anderson, had a "no trespassing" order issued against Cook, which prevented her from serving as an election judge at the school during a special election. Cook had been an election judge for the past 20 years...

UPDATE: Gazette Editorial August 5, 2009:
...Cook's unconventional approach should teach the administrators and students at the high school a thing or two about being responsible neighbors...

Friday, June 12, 2009

Takoma Voice: Proud to be a PIA

School Scene by Sue Katz Miller
June 2009
Proud to be a PIA
“Parent Insistently Advocating”
by Sue Katz Miller

As the year draws to a close, schools usually reward parents with mugs and luncheons and certificates to thank them for volunteering. This year, some parents felt they were also rewarded with a slap from the Board of Education for being too involved. At a school board meeting in May, board vice president Pat O’Neill insisted on the right of Principals to exclude “PIAs, the pain in the ass people” from the School Improvement Teams (SITs) composed of parents and staff in each school. Member Chris Barclay stated that “cooperative” and “respectful” parents may be more likely to get invited to the teams.

Article continues here.

Wednesday, May 27, 2009

Turf Talk - Watch out for the Goose Poop!

Last night, during public testimony at the Montgomery County Board of Education meeting (May 26, 2009), several speakers addressed potential health concerns involved in artificial turf field. Note that recent concerns about problems with artificial turf fields include more than antibiotic resistant strep and overheating of the fields.

Here is what the manufacturers of the materials coming to the Walter Johnson Athletic field say about their product:


FieldTurf's grass fibers are surrounded and stabilized by a special blend of synthetic earth - FieldTurf's patented mixture of smooth, rounded silica sand and rubber granules.

The rubber granules are a key component. Tire rubber is cryogenically frozen,
shattered into smooth, clean, rounded particles, sized and shaped to stay in
suspension with the sand, which is of a similar size, shape and weight.


Rubber granules from tires?

Yes. Here is what the experts from Mount Sinai's Center for Excellence in Childrens Environmental Health say about these components:


The major chemical components of crumb rubber are styrene and butadiene, the
principal ingredients of the synthetic rubber used for tires in the United
States. Styrene is neurotoxic. Butadiene is a proven human carcinogen.
It has been shown to cause leukemia and lymphoma. The crumb rubber pellets
that go into synthetic turf fields also contain lead, cadmium and
other metals. Some of these metals are included in tires during manufacture,
and others picked up by tires as they roll down the nation’s streets and
highways. There is a potential for all of these toxins to be inhaled,
absorbed through the skin and even swallowed by children who play on
synthetic turf fields.
Lead was recently found in synthetic turf fields in New Jersey at levels so high that several fields were closed by the state Health Department.


The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention were so concerned, they issued a Health Advisory, and recommended the following precautions for families with children younger than age six:

Children ages 6 and younger are most susceptible to lead’s harmful health
effects. To protect the public, in particular young children, consider
posting signs indicating that:
1. After playing on the field, individuals are encouraged to perform aggressive
hand and body washing for at least 20 seconds using soap and warm
water.
2. Clothes worn on the field should be taken off and turned inside out as soon as possible after using the field to avoid tracking contaminated dust to other
places. In vehicles, people can sit on a large towel or blanket if it is not
feasible to remove their clothes. These clothes, towels, and blankets should be
washed separately and shoes worn on the field should be kept outside of the
home.
3. Eating while on the field or turf product is discouraged.
4. Avoid contaminating drinking containers with dust and fibers from the
field. When not drinking, close them and keep them in a bag, cooler, or other covered container on the side of the field.

And the response from Dr. Weast and the Board of Education?
Dr. Weast assured the audience that Phil Andrews did a thorough evaluation and determined that artificial turf is safe for our county playing fields. You can find Mr. Andrew's assessment in the memos accompanying the County Council's Education Committee decision to approve the turf at Richard Montgomery HS. memo1 memo 2
And Pat O'Neill? As an alum of Walter Johnson HS and a mom of two MCPS graduates, she is very concerned about geese poop on the fields. Her recommendation? Post a sign that says, don't ingest the turf. Does this mean that our MCPS kindergartners can practice reading those signs to their younger sibs? What a bonus benefit.