Showing posts with label RFP. Show all posts
Showing posts with label RFP. Show all posts

Friday, May 6, 2022

Councilmember Tom Hucker: "heard complaints... other bidders...were local felt like status as local & minority owned...wasn't given appropriate number of points..." #MCPSElectricSchoolBuses


On March 29, 2022, 
the Montgomery County Council discussed funding for a new MCPS bus depot.  

During the discussion Councilmember Tom Hucker states that he was recently speaking at a national conference and heard complaints about the MCPS electric bus procurement. Video below and at this link

Councilmember Hucker says he spoke with companies who could have bid on the MCPS Electric School Bus proposal but didn't, and companies who bid on the proposal and were rejected. 




In the video clip below, Councilmember Hucker is speaking to Montgomery County Director of General Services David E. Dise.
 

Tuesday, February 22, 2022

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL ("RFP") for Custodian Bank Services for MCPS Retirement System Trust. As of 10/31/2021, the MCPS Retirement System Trust had assets of approximately $2.4 billion.

On behalf of the Board of Education of Montgomery County, Maryland, Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS) is seeking proposals from qualified master trustee/custodian providers in five different capacities: custody services (stand-alone); benefit payment management (stand-alone); custody services and benefit payment management; custody services and portfolio analytics; lastly, custody services, benefit payment management, and portfolio analytics. The respondents will be evaluated in each capacity separately, with a final determination made after the proposals are received and evaluated. The contract is anticipated to begin in July 2022. MCPS currently utilizes BNY Mellon as master custodian provider for custody services and Aetna Life Insurance Company for benefit payment management.

NEPC, LLC (NEPC) has been retained by MCPS to assist in the process of conducting an evaluation of qualified applicants (Firms, and each a Firm). Representatives from NEPC may contact responders that submit proposals in relation to this Request for Proposal (RFP).

As of October 31, 2021, the MCPS Retirement System Trust (Trust) had assets of approximately $2.4 billion.

RFP inquiries and submissions are due by the deadlines above.  Inquiries must be directed to procurement at Angela_S_Mcintosh-Davis@mcpsmd.org.  Proposals submitted will require a two-step process. Firms must submit one original and one electronic version on a flash drive, and one redacted copy of the full proposal must be sent by mail, courier, or hand-delivery.  Firms will also be required to submit proposals via InHub (www.theinhub.com) to NEPC.  See 7.0 Mandatory Submissions in the RFP for full detail.  Proposals are to be received, as well as submitted via InHub, no later than 2:00 p.m. eastern on February 28, 2022. 

To request access to the online RFP submission platform, please fill out the Request Access form (right).  Additional details, including a copy of the RFP can be found on the MCPS website.

 https://www.erfp.us/inhub-mcps-custodian-rfp/

Wednesday, December 1, 2021

Vendor DID Get a MD Grant, But Jack Smith Told Board of Education: "As far as MCPS and the vendor know, this is the first budget neutral, non-grant dependent, school bus fleet electrification plan available."

Non-grant dependent? The vendor was awarded a grant from the State of Maryland the very next day. The grant had been applied for weeks earlier.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 

February 23, 2021

Montgomery County Board of Education

Contract Approval for RFP No. 9462.1 Electrification of School Buses


...On August 31, 2020, MCPS issued a Request for Proposals for turn-key, budget neutral, electrification of the school bus fleet. Highland Electric Transportation, Inc., Hamilton, Massachusetts, was the offeror selected following the Request for Proposals evaluation process.

A contract has been negotiated and is recommended for approval with HET MCPS, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary created by Highland Electric Transportation, Inc., specifically for this project.

Budget neutrality is possible over time because this vendor will invest in the otherwise high up-front costs of purchasing electric school buses with the plan to recoup that investment over time through decreasing vehicle prices, less expensive fuel (electric vs. diesel), and maintenance savings. MCPS will continue to spend what otherwise would be spent purchasing, operating, fueling, and maintaining equivalent diesel school buses until the investment is recouped.

Then MCPS will spend less than what otherwise would be spent on equivalent diesel buses.

As far as MCPS and the vendor know, this is the first budget neutral, non-grant dependent, school bus fleet electrification plan available. This is the leading edge of the trend that is expected to sweep through the school bus industry...

https://go.boarddocs.com/mabe/mcpsmd/Board.nsf/files/BYJNVV6118CC/$file/ADOPTED%20Cont%20Apprv%20RFP%209462.1%20Electrification%20Sch%20Buses.pdf

Monday, November 29, 2021

EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW: Todd Watkins, Montgomery County Public Schools. Delegate David Fraser-Hidalgo introduced Vendor to MCPS.

 March 5, 2021

...Highland is one of many companies that has approached me over the last few years about electric school buses. This particular introduction was through one of our state delegates, David Fraser-Hidalgo, who is very into sustainability and environmental issues. He is the one that first asked for a meeting and brought us together with Highland.

Right from the beginning, they were a class act in my mind. They actually reached out in advance and shared their story and their agenda. I so appreciated that.

We then went to this meeting, and they shared their plan, and everyone started to question if it was possible with the existing funding, because prior to this, nobody thought it was. Everybody thought you had to get a grant or come up with a pot of money to make this work.

So we started looking into it a little bit further. We wanted to make sure that as we were investigating this, we did it in a way that fit with public school procurement, and so fairly quickly we put out an RFI, so that anyone who might have similar ideas could feed us information, that way we weren’t just dealing with one vendor...

...Prior to that, we bought our diesels and financed them over six years, but we didn’t want to go into big debt and take on the cost of electric vehicles right away, so we asked for a lease, we asked for budget-neutral, we asked for design and install, and management of all of the charging pieces. We asked for them to include the electric in the price, and we asked for them to maintain the buses. We actually maintain all of our diesel buses in our five depots, and we have five full automotive shops that run five days a week, and we didn’t want to lose those people.

We asked that they be responsible for the cost of maintenance, but we wanted a contract for us to provide the maintenance service, and that was a way to control the total cost without getting rid of our maintenance tradition...

...And at the same time, we were spending a lot of time scrubbing the contract and worked with an outside counsel group and our own Office of General Counsel. As we were getting close to the end of that project, I felt that we had spent so much time working on the legal aspects, but I didn’t feel that we had done enough analysis of the financial pieces. Someone from our budget office really helped us with that, and there was a very complex financial model that Highland created which we reviewed extensively.

One slip of a formula somewhere could have made millions of dollars of difference over the 16 years of replacing the fleet. I wanted to go to my board with a high degree of confidence and demonstrating that we are going to spend close to the same amount that we spent on diesel buses for the first six years, and then we actually start saving money as compared to using diesel buses.

That is without any grant money. It is not grant-dependent from the school system’s perspective, which is what was important to us in inking this deal.

Highland took on all the risk of that piece. They are hoping for and expecting to get some grants in this proposal that they will be applying for on behalf of them and us, and we have a sharing mechanism for the grants when they come in. They anticipate those grants enabling them to offer continually-better pricing as we move through the entire fleet, which is important. We save directly from a grant, which will accelerate our savings. Enough grants coming in could move the saving point up to year four instead of year seven, for example.

The more grant support on Highland’s end, the more they are able to offer competitive pricing along the way. It is not grant-dependent, but that doesn’t mean we aren’t seeking grants...

...This year we are leasing 25 electrics and buying 113 diesels. Next year, we are leasing 61 electrics, and the rest of our purchase will be diesel. We think it will be around 60. Then from year three on, we are doing nothing but electric, no more diesels, in terms of purchasing. We are going to let each diesel live out its useful life that we have already invested in, while replacing our fleet.

That third year will be the first year of 12 where we replace the entire fleet. Then years 13 and 14 will come back and pick up the diesels that we bought this year and next year. It is over 14 years that we replace all 1,422, and we believe that we can, as the need for maintenance comes down, save maintenance costs in two ways. One is that for each electric bus, we will save half of what we spent on diesel maintenance, and the second, is that we are going to get reimbursed by Highland for continuing our own maintenance...

https://school-busride.com/exclusive-interview-todd-watkins-montgomery-county-public-schools/

MCPS Electric Bus Deal: County Exec. Marc Elrich Introduced Company to MCPS. Delegate Fraser-Hidalgo Introduced Elrich to Company.

-February 27, 2021

...Montgomery County Executive Marc B. Elrich (D) said he brought school system transportation and Highland Electric officials together after meeting the company’s CEO, Duncan McIntyre, in Annapolis.

The two had been introduced by Del. David Fraser-Hidalgo (D-Montgomery), a longtime proponent of electric buses.

In talking with McIntyre, Elrich became convinced that tax credits and depreciation allowances were starting to shift the economics... surrounding electric buses in a significant way...

https://www.marylandmatters.org/2021/02/27/montgomery-school-system-deal-to-lease-electric-buses-called-historic/

Tuesday, February 10, 2015

Parents' Coalition Calls For Competitive Bids and Open Superintendent Search Process

Testimony of Sheldon Fishman
Before the Montgomery County Board of Education
February 10, 2015


Good morning, members of the Board of Education and Superintendent Starr. My name is Sheldon
Fishman. I live in Silver Spring and I am a member of the Parents Coalition. I am a longstanding
supporter of MCPS schools. My four children are successful MCPS graduates, as is their mother ‐
my wife, Lee‐who is a proud graduate of Wheaton High School. And now, the next generation of my
family is getting ready for school. If all goes according to plan, my granddaughter will participate in
MCPS kindergarten orientation for the class entering in September 2019.

I appreciate the opportunity to share my thoughts on the process of selecting a new superintendent
of schools. I recognize that each of you approaches this task with great seriousness. This is not an
enviable task; I am sure it is difficult to say goodbye to Dr. Starr, but that decision has been made.
I have two points about the selection process to offer to you today.

The first involves the selection of a search firm to aid in identifying candidates. According to the
meeting materials, the Board selected a search firm. No open bidding, no new proposals. While it’s
expedient to select the same firm that helped the BOE twelve years ago in identifying candidates,
ask yourself, did we get the most for our money? What do alternative firms do? Did this firm do a
good job in recommending Dr. Massie? (source: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wpsrv/local/daily/june99/massie6.htm ). While time is short, please consider competitive bids and
perhaps a new headhunter.


Second, please use a transparent process and involve the community. Yes, this selection involves a personnel decision, but "personnel" should not be used to defend unnecessary secrecy. A selection process that is both transparent and still protects privacy will give taxpayers more confidence in their elected officials. More important, transparency will empower the new superintendent to be bold. Other school systems use a more open process than MCPS has done. For example, Hartford Public Schools invited all three finalists to three public forums with each forum aimed at a different audience. And everything is streamed live.

http://www.hartfordschools.org/index.php/2012‐05‐09‐04‐13‐37/123‐spotlight/spotlight‐articlesissue‐35‐04142014‐district/976‐superintendent‐candidate‐forums‐overview‐2

And please ‐ when you do have parents involved, don't require them to sign a non‐disclosure
agreement that last in perpetuity
. How can these individuals seek the opinions of their constituent
members if they cannot discuss the appointment or the selection factors?

In conclusion, will my daughter be able to come to this table and say, “MCPS was excellent for me
and is providing an even better experience for my daughter?”

Thank you.

Monday, February 24, 2014

$22 Million Dollar Monday at the Board of Education!!!

Do you love to spend? Do you love to spend millions? 
Do you love to spend without knowing how you are spending your money?  
Then a seat on the Montgomery County Board of Education is for you!  
It's not too late to sign up to run for one of the four open seats this year!

You too can sit at the Board of Education and spend $22,496,074 in one minute without any discussion or any clue as to what your buying!
That's what is going to happen this evening at the February 24, 2014, Board of Education meeting.

The Consent Agenda for this evening has 5 separate items that total $22,496,074 in spending without any explanation other than the name of the vendor and a brief sentence of the possible items purchased! No details!  Consent Agenda means no discussion!

Let's take a look at just one of those 5 items.  Agenda Item 5.5 is to spend $13,981,044 on a vendor named DISYS Solutions, Inc.

Superintendent Joshua Starr wrote a memo to tell the Board they are buying a bunch of computer stuff from DISYS Solutions, Inc. and that the contract is an "extension."

Extension means this contract was not put out for a competitive bid this year. Superintendent Starr just "extended" the contract into this year.  But, here's the fun part.  Last year (FY 2013) this vendor was only paid $8,036,421.  Superintendent Starr is "extending" the contract to pay this vendor $5,944,623 over what they were paid last year!  Wow! Party at DISYS Solutions, Inc!


7067.4 Computer Network Equipment, Software, and Service-Extension
Awardee

DISYS Solutions, Inc. $13,981,044