Showing posts with label State's Attorney. Show all posts
Showing posts with label State's Attorney. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 26, 2023

New report includes a troubling revelation that the Anne Arundel County State’s Attorney’s Office granted the pastor of a Catholic Church blanket protection from prosecution in 1985

Deep within the litany of outrages by the Catholic Church documented by the Maryland Office of the Attorney General’s report, there is a revelation as shocking as the predatory priests or the religious bureaucracy eager to hide their sins.

Nearly four decades ago, the Anne Arundel County State’s Attorney’s Office, led then by Warren B. Duckett, granted immunity to a child abuser.

By 1985, angry families at St. Andrew by the Bay near Cape St. Claire demanded that the Archdiocese of Baltimore remove and punish their lead priest, William Simms. Accusations that he had abused multiple children in his care were tumbling out, and parents wanted action. The church in 2002 listed him as credibly accused, the attorney general’s report said.

That July nearly 38 years ago, an Anne Arundel County assistant prosecutor sent a letter to attorneys for the church, Gallagher Evelius & Jones.

“I agree on behalf of the State’s Attorney’s Office not to prosecute Father Simms for any incidents of child abuse he discusses with [county police investigators], no matter how serious, and whether we already know about them or not,” the prosecutor wrote in a letter referenced by the report...

A Maryland prosecutor granted immunity to a predatory priest. Only the truth holds him accountable. - BishopAccountability.org (bishop-accountability.org)

Monday, April 20, 2015

Warning: Montgomery Co. Will Not Protect Names of Children Who Are Victims of Sexual Abuse by Adults

If you watched or read the Fox5 report on the recent allegations regarding a Chevy Chase karate teacher you heard or saw this statement at the end of the article.
...Detectives would like to identify and speak to these victims captured on the videos to determine possible criminal acts that may have occurred. Victim information will be confidential and victims are strongly urged to call investigators.

The Parents' Coalition regrets to inform Montgomery County parents and guardians that the above statement is not true.  While Montgomery County Police may keep the names of victims confidential during investigations, when official public charging documents are filed in District or Circuit Court, the Montgomery County State's Attorney will not redact the names of children who have been victims of sexual abuse by adults.

The Parents' Coalition has found numerous examples of public charging documents where the first name, last name and birth date of the CHILD VICTIMS have been printed in the public charging documents.

Thinking that the failure to redact the names of these children was an error, we contacted the Montgomery County State's Attorney's office directly.  We learned from the Montgomery County State's Attorney Division Chief Debbie Feinstein that the Montgomery County State's Attorney's office DOES NOT REDACT THE NAMES OF CHILDREN WHO ARE VICTIMS OF SEXUAL ABUSE.

We know that other Maryland Counties do redact the names of children when they are the victims of sexual abuse by adults.

We are horrified and stunned that Montgomery County does not protect children who have been victims of sexual abuse.

Tuesday, August 5, 2014

More Out of Date BOE Policy on Child Abuse and Neglect

Part 2 of our look at the Board of Education's out-of-date Child Abuse and Neglect policy. 

Page 4 of the out of date BOE policy shows section 5-704.  Cross that out and see below for what the law actually looks like today.  

Give a copy to your child's teacher. 
They won't have seen current Maryland law in their MCPS training. 


FAMILY LAW  
TITLE 5.  CHILDREN  
SUBTITLE 7.  CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT

Md. FAMILY LAW Code Ann. § 5-704  (2014)

§ 5-704. Reporting of abuse or neglect -- By health practitioner, police officer, educator, or human service worker 


   (a) In general. -- Notwithstanding any other provision of law, including any law on privileged communications, each health practitioner, police officer, educator, or human service worker, acting in a professional capacity in this State:

   (1) who has reason to believe that a child has been subjected to abuse or neglect, shall notify the local department or the appropriate law enforcement agency; and

   (2) if acting as a staff member of a hospital, public health agency, child care institution, juvenile detention center, school, or similar institution, shall immediately notify and give all information required by this section to the head of the institution or the designee of the head.


(b) Oral and written reports; cooperation among departments and agencies. --

   (1) An individual who notifies the appropriate authorities under subsection (a) of this section shall make:

      (i) an oral report, by telephone or direct communication, as soon as possible to the local department or appropriate law enforcement agency; and

      (ii) a written report:

         1. to the local department not later than 48 hours after the contact, examination, attention, or treatment that caused the individual to believe that the child had been subjected to abuse or neglect; and

         2. with a copy to the local State's Attorney.

   (2) (i) An agency to which an oral report of suspected abuse or neglect is made under paragraph (1) of this subsection shall immediately notify the other agency.

      (ii) This paragraph does not prohibit a local department and an appropriate law enforcement agency from agreeing to cooperative arrangements.

(c) Contents of report. -- Insofar as is reasonably possible, an individual who makes a report under this section shall include in the report the following information:

   (1) the name, age, and home address of the child;

   (2) the name and home address of the child's parent or other person who is responsible for the child's care;

   (3) the whereabouts of the child;

   (4) the nature and extent of the abuse or neglect of the child, including any evidence or information available to the reporter concerning possible previous instances of abuse or neglect; and

   (5) any other information that would help to determine:

      (i) the cause of the suspected abuse or neglect; and

      (ii) the identity of any individual responsible for the abuse or neglect.

HISTORY: 1987, ch. 635, § 2; 1989, ch. 730, §§ 1, 2; 1997, chs. 367, 368; 1998, ch. 21, § 1; 2000, ch. 61, § 1; 2003, ch. 308; 2011, chs. 398, 399; 2013, ch. 380.

Tuesday, June 17, 2014

Breaking News: Office of State Prosecutor Requests BOE Expense Reports

At today's Board of Education meeting, Board of Education President Phil Kauffman just announced that among those that requested copies of Board of Education expense reports was the Office of the State Prosecutor.  Mr. Kauffman said that the Board will be cooperating with the Prosecutor's office.

Wednesday, March 5, 2014

MCPS Should Have Called Child Protective Services 25 Times...Another Teacher with Restrictions on his ability to touch students!

Instead of calling Child Protective Services, MCPS has set up an internal database for instances that "just don't feel right."  

Note to the Board of Education and Superintendent Joshua Starr:  YOUR RESPONSIBILITY IS TO CALL CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES when there is suspected inappropriate contact between a teacher and a child.  That's the law! It is Child Protective Services' job to investigate!  

Look what this Gazette article reveals! Another teacher with restrictions on his ability to TOUCH students!  How many teachers/staff today have a restriction on their ability to touch or interact with students?


Gazette:  New Montgomery school database tracks reported inappropriate staff behavior

About 25 incidents entered this school year
...One staff member involved in an incident that was reported in the database this year was terminated after he had previously been told not to touch students, Grundy said. Other incidents listed included a teacher who tapped a student on the butt and another who lifted students in the air.
...One employee, who had previously been told not to touch students, was terminated this school year after he was seen holding hands with two female students, Grundy said. Grundy said he thinks that, in that case, the principal would have picked up on the repeated behavior without the help of the database...

------------------------------------------------
Wednesday March 5, 2014



A new database in Montgomery County Public Schools to track reported allegations of inappropriate staff behavior with students is up and running — and being put to use.
About 25 incidents have been entered into the database this school year, according to Robert Grundy, director of the Performance Evaluation and Compliance Unit in the school system’s Human Resources and Development Office.
One staff member involved in an incident that was reported in the database this year was terminated after he had previously been told not to touch students, Grundy said. Other incidents listed included a teacher who tapped a student on the butt and another who lifted students in the air.
Superintendent Joshua P. Starr said in a June memorandum that the school system would use a confidential database as part of its new tracking system for staff members who engage in inappropriate behavior with students.
Grundy said the database serves as a central location for reported incidents, making it easier to track and “establish a pattern” of behavior from an employee who changes schools.
Grundy said the employee’s name and identification number go into the database — essentially a complex Excel spreadsheet — when a report is made.
“If the same number goes in, it turns red,” he said. “You know there’s a prior incident.”
A report of alleged inappropriate behavior has to be made by a principal for it to be entered in the system, Grundy said.
The school system enters all such reports from principals, he said.
“We’re trying to get those things that just don’t feel right so early on we’re picking these things up as opposed to after the fact,” he said.
Grundy said the school system does not want the database to supplant a call to Child Protective Services.
In addition to entering current incidents, the school system is also going back in its records to add older incidents to the database as well, Grundy said.
Those older incidents include cases that are “more egregious” than what is typically seen and that either the school system’s human resources office or an individual school investigated, he said.
As he has gone back through the records, Grundy said, he said he found that the person involved in each incident has resigned or been terminated in almost every case.
Of the 25 incidents reported this year, Grundy said, one involved a staff member who “tapped a student on the butt.”
Another incident involved a second-grade teacher who lifted students up and down simulating a rollercoaster as a reward in the classroom.
One employee, who had previously been told not to touch students, was terminated this school year after he was seen holding hands with two female students, Grundy said. Grundy said he thinks that, in that case, the principal would have picked up on the repeated behavior without the help of the database.
The database, however, is aimed more at careful reporting that catches behavior from staff members who don’t stay under one principal or at one school.
“We told the principals we want everything reported,” Grundy said.

Thursday, July 18, 2013

Subpoenas to be issued, Principal Out, Students Punished

What does MCPS do when they find financial improprieties at a school?  Punish the students, of course!  

Because Superintendent Starr found problems at Rock Terrace School when students were engaged in transition to work programs, the stipends for all students in these programs will be SUSPENDED for the upcoming year.

Somehow at another MCPS school where a transition to work program is run the program is able to operate without problems:  students work, they open bank accounts and they control their own funds!  But all students in these programs will now be punished this year for the financial improprieties of the staff at one school?

The letter below was posted to the Rock Terrace School website today.  From the letter we learn:
  • Rock Terrace parents were not informed about the stipends or about the bank accounts set up in their child’s name

  • Using its subpoena power, the Montgomery County State’s Attorney’s Office will request account records from the credit union.

  • MCPS will temporarily stop providing stipends to these students until the district is able to clarify whether these stipends should be treated as earned income.
  • MCPS can't figure out that when you pay a student for services the money paid is the property of the student!  The MCPS letter includes this telling sentence:  "But we want to make sure that any stipends received are distributed and spent appropriately."  Sorry Superintendent Starr, the point of teaching students how to handle money is to allow THEM to make mistakes with their own funds.  That's the point of the exercise!  It isn't about controlling the funds after they are paid out. It isn't about taking student funds and spending them on administrator perks.