Showing posts with label strands. Show all posts
Showing posts with label strands. Show all posts

Monday, September 7, 2015

Would Thornton Put a Cell Tower on a Bethesda High School Roof?

Cell tower on roof of Baltimore City school.
Baltimore City Superintendent Gregory Thornton used to work for MCPS and back in 2011 his was one of the names being circulated to replace Superintendent Jerry Weast.
  
Thornton is currently the superintendent of the Baltimore City Public Schools and busy putting cell towers on the roofs of public school buildings.
  
If Thornton had become the MCPS superintendent in 2011, or becomes the superintendent in the future, will he be putting a cell tower on Whitman High School's roof?  

OPEN LETTER TO Superintendent Gregory Thornton and the Baltimore City Board of Education regarding his plan to put a cell tower on the roof of another public high school in Maryland:

Honorable Members of the Baltimore City Public Schools Board and CEO Gregory Thornton,

Please DENY the request before you today, which asks your approval for Wireless Communication Lease Agreement with Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless for the City School site known as Digital Harbor High School #416 (1100 Covington Street, 21230). The action requested would not be consistent with your trust obligations under Section 4-114 of the Maryland Education Article, and would therefore be illegal.

If you doubt our warnings, then please table the matter to seek the Maryland Attorney General’s opinion. Consistent with several previously issued Maryland Attorney General’s opinions and advisories, we are confident that you will receive guidance that your entering into the Cellco/Verizon lease agreement would be illegal.

Maryland Coalition to Halt Cell Towers at Schools 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~


For background on Digital Harbor High School, take a look at the Maryland Report Card information.  Digital Harbor High School is a Strand 4 school in Maryland (Strand 1 is the top of the strand rating scale, Strand 4 is not good news).  Scroll down for more information on Digital Harbor High School.


~~~~~~~~~~~~

From the Baltimore City Public Schools Board Agenda for Tuesday, September 8, 2015:

Meeting
Sep 08, 2015 - Public Board Meeting
Category
PROCUREMENT - CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER
Subject
Cellco Partnership - Verizon Wireless Telecommunication Lease Agreement - The Chief Operating Officer requests the Board’s approval of a Wireless Communication Lease Agreement with Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless for the City School site known as Digital Harbor High School #416, located at 1100 Covington Street, 21230.
Type
Action


Cellco Partnership - Verizon Wireless
Telecommunication Lease Agreement

Request of the Board

The Chief Operating Officer requests the Board’s approval of a Wireless Communication Lease Agreement with Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless for the City School site known as Digital Harbor High School #416, located at 1100 Covington Street, 21230.

This Lease provides for Verizon Wireless to operate 12 wireless communication antenna panels and associated equipment on the rooftop of Digital Harbor High School, to accommodate increased wireless voice and data demand for those residents living in the Harbor East, Federal Hill and Key Highway sections of Baltimore City. 

Annual rent for the first year will be $35,138.40, with annual increases of 4% thereafter throughout the original and renewal terms.

Community notifications in support of this proposed lease were submitted to the following neighborhood groups: Federal Hill Neighborhood Association, Key Highway Community Association, Riverside Neighborhood Association, the Federal Hill South Neighborhood Association and Friends of Federal Hill Park, without any negative feedback received from any community group.

The Baltimore City Board of Municipal & Zoning Appeals, after providing public notice, reviewing the zoning records and holding a public hearing on February 11, 2014, by unanimous consent of the Board of Municipal and Zoning Appeals, approved Verizon’s request to install a new telecommunications facility consisting of 12 antennas and equipment on the rooftop of Digital Harbor High School.  The Resolution of approval was granted on February 24th, 2014.

FCC compliance testing for RF Frequency Exposure has also taken place and the Pre-Installation Assessment shows that the equipment is compliant with FCC and OSHA standards and regulations.

Feedback from the school Principal was also requested, with no negative feedback coming from the Principal of Digital Harbor High School.  

Selection Methodology
Contract Types:          Wireless Communication Lease Agreement
Contract Term:            5 years, commencing upon School Board approval                         
Renewal Term:            3 renewal periods of five (5) years each       
Vendor & Amount:       Cellco Partnership (d/b/a Verizon Wireless)
Funding Source:         N/A
Solicitation Process:   N/A
MBE/ WBE Results:   N/A


Evidence of Effectiveness

Approval of this Lease Agreement will provide for increased wireless coverage to accommodate increased digital demand for those residents [Editor note: NOT FOR BENEFIT OF STUDENTS!] living in the areas of Harbor East, Federal Hill and Key Highway.  Baltimore City Schools benefits from the additional lease revenue that it receives from Verizon Wireless throughout the term of the lease

 Author: Paul Turner

Wednesday, August 28, 2013

Maryland Strand 1 Schools

The Maryland State Department of Education did not release the list of 2013 Strand 1 schools, but we will.

County - School - Score in Strand 1

Baltimore City John Eager Howard Elementary 1.495
Baltimore City Langston Hughes Elementary 1.4825
Baltimore City The Mount Washington School 1.3464
Baltimore City Lyndhurst Elementary 1.3275
Prince George's Chesapeake Math and IT Public Charter 1.2714
Baltimore City Dickey Hill Elementary/Middle 1.2547
Baltimore City Matthew A. Henson Elementary 1.1999
Worcester Snow Hill Elementary 1.1939
Baltimore City Tunbridge Public Charter School 1.1736
Baltimore City Lakeland Elementary/Middle 1.1682
Prince George's Highland Park Elementary 1.164
Frederick Thurmont Primary 1.1495
Prince George's Hollywood Elementary 1.1459
Baltimore City William Paca Elementary 1.1439
Worcester Showell Elementary 1.1381
Baltimore City Baltimore Montessori Public Charter Middle School 1.1377
Baltimore County Chesapeake Terrace Elementary 1.1366
Prince George's Glassmanor Elementary 1.1366
Worcester Ocean City Elementary 1.1225
Prince George's Lewisdale Elementary 1.1115
Allegany Parkside Elementary 1.1114
Calvert Mount Harmony Elementary 1.1107
Wicomico Willards Elementary 1.107
Baltimore City Belmont Elementary 1.1056
Baltimore City Liberty Elementary 1.1046
Anne Arundel Jones Elementary 1.0988
Baltimore County New Town Elementary 1.0976
Baltimore County Cromwell Valley Elementary Technology 1.0911
Charles C. Paul Barnhart Elementary School 1.0858
Baltimore City The Crossroads School 1.0854
Anne Arundel Eastport Elementary 1.084
Anne Arundel West Annapolis Elementary 1.0721
Anne Arundel George T. Cromwell Elementary 1.0706
Carroll Parr's Ridge Elementary 1.0676
Baltimore County Franklin Elementary 1.0674
Harford Norrisville Elementary 1.067
Calvert Windy Hill Elementary 1.0657
Worcester Pocomoke Elementary 1.0647
Prince George's District Heights Elementary 1.0572
Montgomery Bells Mill Elementary 1.0505
Baltimore City Harford Heights Elementary 1.0497
Anne Arundel Fort Smallwood Elementary 1.0483
Baltimore City Medfield Heights Elementary 1.048
Anne Arundel Deale Elementary 1.0266
Carroll Carrolltowne Elementary 1.0262
Montgomery Poolesville Elementary 1.0247
Baltimore City Edgewood Elementary 1.0245
Harford Emmorton Elementary 1.0235
Montgomery Garrett Park Elementary 1.0213
Frederick Middletown Primary 1.0182

2013 Strand 5: MCPS Goes From 6 to 51 schools in the Lowest MSDE Category

Flower Hill Elementary 0.8962
North Chevy Chase Elementary 0.8897
Greencastle Elementary 0.8893
Dr. Sally K. Ride Elementary 0.8889
Clarksburg Elementary 0.8854
Silver Spring International Middle 0.8829
Stedwick Elementary 0.8808
Rocky Hill Middle 0.8808
Jones Lane Elementary 0.8807
Rock Creek Forest Elementary 0.8807
Brookhaven Elementary 0.8802
Martin Luther King Jr. Middle 0.88
Eastern Middle School 0.8799
Ridgeview Middle 0.8753
Earle B. Wood Middle 0.8753
Rolling Terrace Elementary 0.8743
Redland Middle 0.8735
Judith A. Resnik Elementary 0.8733
Summit Hall Elementary 0.8722
Broad Acres Elementary 0.8713
Weller Road Elementary 0.8705
Ritchie Park Elementary 0.8644
South Lake Elementary 0.8595
Burning Tree Elementary 0.8516
Great Seneca Creek Elementary 0.8514
Glen Haven Elementary 0.8508
Montgomery Village Middle School 0.8488
Rosemont Elementary 0.8464
Francis Scott Key Middle 0.8445
Harmony Hills Elementary 0.8444
S. Christa McAuliffe Elementary 0.8435
Argyle Middle 0.837
Sequoyah Elementary 0.8346
New Hampshire Estates Elem 0.8263
Glenallan Elementary 0.8205
DuFief Elementary 0.8147
Gaithersburg Elementary 0.8126
A. Mario Loiederman Middle 0.8058
Oak View Elementary 0.8044
Flora M. Singer Elementary School 0.8038
Strathmore Elementary 0.8018
White Oak Middle 0.7793
Montgomery Knolls Elementary 0.7779
Carl Sandburg Center 0.7752
Takoma Park Elementary 0.7699
Cresthaven Elementary 0.7607
Briggs Chaney Middle 0.7524
Neelsville Middle 0.752
Captain James E. Daly Elementary 0.7483
Bel Pre Elementary 0.7467
Forest Oak Middle 0.7403

If schools fall into Strand 5, the schools have a School Progress Index score lower than 0.9 but may have met as many as two of their targets for Achievement, Gap, and Growth (elementary/middle schools) or Achievement, Gap, and College- and Career-Readiness indicators (high schools) per grade span. The lowest-progressing schools in the State will fall into Strand 5. Schools falling into this strand will generally display school-wide issues that require additional, differentiated services from the LEA. These schools are also going to present the most need from student services. Required supports for Strand 5 schools that are not Title I include using the School Improvement Grant (SIG) process. The SIG process provides clear needs assessments and support through the LEA Turnaround offices. Those Title I schools in this Strand may have access to additional school improvement dollars with well defined plans for improvement. All schools, Title I or non-Title I, will receive differentiated support from the LEA.
Monitoring of these schools will be covered by the LEA and MSDE if they are Priority or Focus. The other schools will be required to provide assurances within the Master Plan to the State Superintendent of Schools that all required interventions, reporting, and monitoring are being supplied by the LEA.

Click here for MCPS Strand 5 from 2012.

MCPS Drops from 37 "Strand 1" Elem. and Middle Schools to 3 in State Ranking

But, we are sure that the MCPS Public Information Office will put out a happy press release about this.  Remember, bad rankings don't mean anything, it's only good ranking that get mentioned!  Stay tuned!

Click here for 2012 Strand 1 MCPS schools

2013 Strand 1 MCPS Schools:

Poolesville Elementary        1.0247
Garrett Park Elementary      1.0213
Bells Mill Elementary         1.0505

Friday, December 21, 2012

Strand 4: The MCPS Schools in Strand 4 of MD's New Accountability Index



Captain James E. Daly Elementary 0.91
Forest Oak Middle 0.92
Burnt Mills Elementary 0.95
William Tyler Page Elementary 0.93
Briggs Chaney Middle 0.98
Rosemont Elementary 0.97
Redland Middle 0.95
Silver Spring International Middle 0.92
Oak View Elementary 0.96
Rolling Terrace Elementary 0.96
Rock Creek Forest Elementary 0.96
White Oak Middle 0.93
Col. E. Brooke Lee Middle 0.95
Strathmore Elementary 0.91


If schools fall into Strand 4, the schools have a School Progress Index score greater than or equal to 0.9 and have not met any of their targets for Achievement, Gap, and Growth (elementary/middle schools) or Achievement, Gap, and College- and Career-Readiness indicators (high schools) per grade span. Strand 4 schools are those that are generally not meeting targets. These schools fall close to the bottom of progress for schools in the State. They are not identified as falling into the last strand but they are near that point. Rarely will these schools have focused problems with one specific subgroup. Most often, a systemic change will be necessary to address all instruction as well as those ancillary supports, like classroom management training, that can prevent other problems from interfering with instruction. Support for the improvement of instruction, the retraining of the leadership staff, and intensified outreach to families to become involved with their child’s school should be addressed by all schools in this strand and with LEA oversight. LEAs should look carefully at the existing supports in the schools to determine effectiveness of the current path to improvement. Schools with serious needs require the attention and support of the whole community and Strand 4 schools will consider intentional activities to create community involvement.
For monitoring, LEAs must include in their Master Plan Update the process that is used to assure that each Strand 4 school has the most effective school improvement plan possible. Additionally, specific guiding questions will ask for a description of any differentiation of supports to these schools with very low scores on the School Progress Index. Any Title I Focus school that falls into Strand 4 will be eligible to apply for 1003(a) School Improvement funds to support the path for improvement stated in their school improvement plans.


Thursday, December 20, 2012

Strand 3: The MCPS Schools in Strand 3 of MD's New Accountability Index

Laytonsville Elementary 0.98

Germantown Elementary 0.98
Ridgeview Middle 0.98
Fox Chapel Elementary 0.91
Waters Landing Elementary 0.97
S. Christa McAuliffe Elementary 0.99
Rosa M. Parks Middle 0.97
Twinbrook Elementary 0.99
Maryvale Elementary 1.09
Julius West Middle 0.97
Ritchie Park Elementary 0.99
Tilden Middle School 0.99
Roscoe R Nix Elementary 0.9
Francis Scott Key Middle 1.08
Galway Elementary 0.99
Paint Branch High 0.92
Greencastle Elementary 1.04
Great Seneca Creek Elementary 1.01
Westland Middle 1.02
North Chevy Chase Elementary 0.99
Burning Tree Elementary 0.94
Thomas W. Pyle Middle School 1.07
Lucy V. Barnsley Elementary 0.96
Flower Valley Elementary 0.97
Shady Grove Middle 1
Lakelands Park Middle 0.99
Watkins Mill High 0.96
Washington Grove Elementary 1.03
Gaithersburg Elementary 0.99
Brown Station Elementary 0.96
Sequoyah Elementary 0.96
Fields Road Elementary 0.93
Stedwick Elementary 0.98
Strawberry Knoll Elementary 0.95
Damascus Elementary 0.98
John T. Baker Middle School 0.94
Rocky Hill Middle 0.97
Piney Branch Elementary 0.98
Takoma Park Middle School 0.96
Woodlin Elementary 0.95
Glen Haven Elementary 1.03
Oakland Terrace Elementary 1.01
Sligo Middle 1.03
Sargent Shriver Elementary 0.94
Albert Einstein High 0.93
Newport Mill Middle 0.99
Rock View Elementary 1.09
Harmony Hills Elementary 0.97
Cresthaven Elementary 0.92
Earle B. Wood Middle 0.97

If schools fall into Strand 3, the schools have a School Progress Index score greater than or equal to 0.9 and have met at least one of their three targets for Achievement, Gap, and Growth (elementary/middle schools) or Achievement, Gap, and College- and Career-Readiness indicators (high schools) per grade span. Strand 3 schools will show an increase in the intensity of needs identified by the School Improvement Process. Schools in Strand 3 may have multiple subgroups struggling to achieve standards or may have intensive, pervasive problems for one very low-performing subgroup. More often than for schools in Strand 2, LEAs and schools may determine the need for a systemic solution rather than, or in addition to, continued support to individual subgroups. Title I schools that fall into this Strand will be eligible to apply for 1003(a) School Improvement Grant funds to support the direction toward improvement detailed in the SIP.
LEAs are directed to oversee the School Improvement Process for Strand 3 schools. Many configurations may be used for the delivery of professional development or training but LEAs must be closely in touch with these schools and regularly checking on progress. Additionally, LEAs will have a section of the Master Plan to address Strand 3 activities separately. Commonalities of the school concerns should be addressed and detailed plans for improvement should be included. Successes and challenges will be addressed through monitoring questions developed by the BTE External Advisory Panel.

Wednesday, December 19, 2012

Strand 2: The MCPS Schools in Strand 2 of MD's New Accountability Index

Clopper Mill Elementary 1.03
Clarksburg Elementary 1.01
Seneca Valley High 0.99
Martin Luther King Jr. Middle 0.98
Quince Orchard High 1
Poolesville Elementary 1
Roberto W. Clemente Middle 1.01
Rachel Carson Elementary 1.05
Garrett Park Elementary 0.99
Lakewood Elementary 1.16
Meadow Hall Elementary 1.03
Travilah Elementary 1.12
Farmland Elementary 1.16
Luxmanor Elementary 1.04
Wayside Elementary 1.17
Robert Frost Middle School 1.11
DuFief Elementary 0.94
Dr. Sally K. Ride Elementary 0.99
Thurgood Marshall Elementary 1.03
Northwest High 1.03
John H. Poole Middle 1.02
Clarksburg High 0.98
Burtonsville Elementary 1.11
Fairland Elementary 1.1
Broad Acres Elementary 1
Cannon Road Elementary 1.06
Stonegate Elementary 0.97
James Hubert Blake High 1.02
Benjamin Banneker Middle 1.03
Bethesda Elementary 0.98
Westbrook Elementary 1.04
Bradley Hills Elementary 1.1
North Bethesda Middle 1.1
Ashburton Elementary 0.98
Walt Whitman High 1.06
Sherwood Elementary 1.02
Olney Elementary 1.08
William H. Farquhar Middle 1.03
Cashell Elementary 1.13
Greenwood Elementary 1.05
Judith A. Resnik Elementary 1.13
Sligo Creek Elementary 1
Brooke Grove Elementary 0.99
Spark M. Matsunaga Elementary School 1.02
Goshen Elementary 1.02
Flower Hill Elementary 1.04
Gaithersburg Middle 1.02
Whetstone Elementary 1.06
Watkins Mill Elementary 1.02
South Lake Elementary 1.05
Diamond Elementary 1.08
Winston Churchill High 1.06
Bells Mill Elementary 1.06
Monocacy Elementary 1.03
Damascus High 1.04
Cedar Grove Elementary 1.09
Woodfield Elementary 1.14
Clearspring Elementary 1.06
Kingsview Middle 0.98
Dr. Charles R. Drew Elementary 0.98
Takoma Park Elementary 1.01
Montgomery Blair High 1.01
Pine Crest Elementary 1
Viers Mill Elementary 1.01
Highland Elementary 1.13
Eastern Middle School 1.01
Weller Road Elementary 0.99
Bel Pre Elementary 1.02
Kensington Parkwood Elementary 1.06
Wheaton Woods Elementary 1.07
Arcola Elementary 1.04
New Hampshire Estates Elem 1.02
Northwood High School 0.98
Springbrook High 0.97
Forest Knolls Elementary 1.03
Kemp Mill Elementary 1.03
Brookhaven Elementary 1.02
Parkland Middle 0.99
Glenallan Elementary 1.03
Rock Terrace School 1.02

If schools fall into Strand 2, the schools have a School Progress Index score greater than or equal to 0.9 and will have met at least two of their three targets for Achievement, Gap, and Growth (elementary/middle schools) or Achievement, Gap, and College- and Career-Readiness indicators (high schools) per grade span. The successes and challenges of schools in Strand 2 will be varied. Schools may excel at Mathematics but lag in reading or vice-versa. In this case, the balance of Achievement, Growth, Gap Reduction and College- and Career-Readiness Goals can yield relatively high-performing schools with targeted needs that, when addressed, could lead them to enter Strand 1.
More than one area of need may drive the school to focus on one and then another intervention sequentially or consider a quasi-systemic plan that would embrace all of the needs at once. The SIP process will again ensure that each subgroup is addressed and identified needs drive professional development for teachers and appropriate interventions for the students. MSDE will dictate no specific support for schools in Strand 2. However, it is expected that LEAs will take particular interest in the needs in these schools. Although an individual school’s assessment of data is recommended for sustained improvement, it will additionally serve as an excellent source for the LEA to determine system-wide professional development.
LEA monitoring for Strand 2 schools will be identical to the random inspection of SIPs as described for Strand 1, with a larger sample of four to five percent. MSDE will also require the LEA with Strand 2 schools to describe in the annual Master Plan Update the overall process for addressing the production of useful, focused SIPs; the commonalities discovered through this analyses and syntheses of data; and the system-wide professional development plan that emerges from that work. There will be specific language in the Master Plan guidance developed by the Bridge to Excellence (BTE) External Advisory Panel.

Tuesday, December 18, 2012

Strand 5: The MCPS Schools in Strand 5 of MD's New Accountability Index


Neelsville Middle 0.86
Carl Sandburg Center 0.87
Alternative Programs 0.75
Gateway to College Program 0.9
Montgomery Village Middle School 0.87
Georgian Forest Elementary 0.84
A. Mario Loiederman Middle 0.88
Argyle Middle 0.87


If schools fall into Strand 5, the schools have a School Progress Index score lower than 0.9 but may have met as many as two of their targets for Achievement, Gap, and Growth (elementary/middle schools) or Achievement, Gap, and College- and Career-Readiness indicators (high schools) per grade span. The lowest-progressing schools in the State will fall into Strand 5. Schools falling into this strand will generally display school-wide issues that require additional, differentiated services from the LEA. These schools are also going to present the most need from student services. Required supports for Strand 5 schools that are not Title I include using the School Improvement Grant (SIG) process. The SIG process provides clear needs assessments and support through the LEA Turnaround offices. Those Title I schools in this Strand may have access to additional school improvement dollars with well defined plans for improvement. All schools, Title I or non-Title I, will receive differentiated support from the LEA.
Monitoring of these schools will be covered by the LEA and MSDE if they are Priority or Focus. The other schools will be required to provide assurances within the Master Plan to the State Superintendent of Schools that all required interventions, reporting, and monitoring are being supplied by the LEA.

Strand 1: The MCPS Schools in Strand 1 of MD's New Accountability Index

Longview School 1.92
Rosemary Hills Elementary 1.28
Stephen Knolls School 1.21
Seven Locks Elementary 1.2
Cold Spring Elementary 1.19
Stone Mill Elementary 1.19
Carderock Springs Elementary 1.18
Poolesville High 1.17
Rock Creek Valley Elementary 1.17
Candlewood Elementary 1.14
Mill Creek Towne Elementary 1.14
Thomas S. Wootton High 1.13
Herbert Hoover Middle 1.12
College Gardens Elementary 1.12
Bannockburn Elementary 1.12
Wyngate Elementary 1.12
Beverly Farms Elementary 1.11
Chevy Chase Elementary 1.11
Richard Montgomery High 1.1
Jackson Road Elementary 1.09
Wood Acres Elementary 1.09
Little Bennett Elementary 1.08
William B. Gibbs, Jr. 1.08
Sherwood High 1.08
Westover Elementary 1.08
Belmont Elementary 1.08
Ronald A. McNair Elementary 1.07
Fallsmead Elementary 1.07
Darnestown Elementary 1.07
Somerset Elementary 1.07
Walter Johnson High 1.07
Montgomery Knolls Elementary 1.07
Lois P. Rockwell Elementary 1.06
Bethesda-Chevy Chase High 1.06
John F. Kennedy High 1.06
Lake Seneca Elementary 1.05
Beall Elementary 1.05
Rockville High 1.05
Jones Lane Elementary 1.05
Potomac Elementary 1.05
Cabin John Middle School 1.05
Summit Hall Elementary 1.04
Highland View Elementary 1.04
Col. Zadok Magruder High 1.03
Wheaton High 1.03
Gaithersburg High 1.02
Cloverly Elementary 1
East Silver Spring Elementary 1

If schools fall into Strand 1, the schools have a School Progress Index score of 1.0 or better and will have met their targets for Achievement, Gap, and Growth (elementary/middle schools) or Achievement, Gap, and College- and Career-Readiness indicators (high schools) per grade span. These schools are usually meeting and exceeding the academic standards for all students. Schools that score in this Strand may have met the minimum standards set by the State for closing the achievement gaps but will, through development of the School Improvement Plan (SIP), want to set even higher standards. Additionally, schools will examine the data they have that indicate any need whether academic, physical, emotional, or cultural and develop intervention plans.

Since data for the School Progress Index will be published annually, focused and intense interventions for students not showing growth will need to be provided to maintain the status of a Strand 1 school. Although the Maryland School Assessments (MSAs) are meant to assess the most important academic content in all Maryland classrooms, teachers and leaders understand that they are responsible for the whole child. That means that at times tools to keep students organized and persevering in their work will need to be partnered with the ongoing support for the content of English/Language Arts, Mathematics, and Science.
Support to these schools beyond the SIP may take different forms. The school should be able to identify the professional development and training that can lead to additional improvement in achievement. The LEA may provide this resource or schools may leverage other sources of funding to seek training beyond the current staff within the LEA.
Monitoring for these schools is left to the LEA and its theory of action. Each year the LEA will review the SIPs of a random sample of one to three percent of the schools in Strand 1. The LEA Superintendent will report on the examination of these plans through the Master Plan process (reviewed by MSDE) assuring that any omissions or inadequacies will be addressed in these and all other SIPs. This will allow MSDE to have insight into the School Improvement Plan process from the school’s perspective and the school will receive feedback that will assist with the continued improvement of the school’s ability to diagnose and prescribe interventions.

http://mdreportcard.org/SpiStrands.aspx?PV=14:0:15:XXXX:2

Maryland's New Accountability Index: Strands

Strands
Strand classifications are assigned to school level data only. County and the State SPI results are not assigned a strand classification.
The School Progress Index (SPI) and the school’s result on each of the Indicators of the Index will give the school a very clear picture of their progress to meeting targets. Once the School Progress Index is calculated (with values of 0 to 1 or greater), the scores will be broken into five strands for identifying interventions, support, and recognition to schools. Schools in Strand 1 will be schools meeting all targets and schools not meeting any of their targets will likely be in Strand 5. Although schools will, as always, have very unique profiles, the Maryland State Department of Education (MSDE) will group the schools based on a measure of the magnitude of the issues these schools face when meeting their targets. This Strand categorization allows MSDE and the Local Education Agency (LEA) to differentiate resources to schools by magnitude of need while precise diagnosis occurs at the school.