Montgomery
County
Taxpayers League Meeting
Check out our new website www.mctaxpayersleague.org
Wednesday, December, 17, 2014
-
7:00 - 9:00 pm
5th Floor Conference Room, Council Office Building
100 Maryland Avenue, Rockville, MD 20850
5th Floor Conference Room, Council Office Building
100 Maryland Avenue, Rockville, MD 20850
Topic: "Montgomery County Public Schools - Perspectives from a Current and a New School Board Member"
Speakers:
Mike Durso, Montgomery County School Board Member, District 5
Jill Ortman-Fouse, Montgomery County School Board Member, At-Large
Questions sent to the speakers in advance of the meeting:
1.
Only 25% of county households have children in the public school
system, yet 100% of households pay for the schools. There is a quite
widely held view that the Board and the Superintendent do not appear
interested in answering questions from the public. What will you do to
increase communication between MCPS and the other 75% of households who
foot the bill but have no students in the public school system?
2.
The Maintenance of Effort (MoE) law while a boon to the school system
provides no such favors to the rest of the County government. With the
recent dismal revenue projections for Montgomery County which will very
likely result in a reduction to the County Government in FY 2016 while
increasing funding to the school system at the mandated MoE level, what
is your position on the MoE law and do you have any suggestions for its
amendment?
3.
Given the growing over-capacity of our school buildings and the
proliferation of portables, the need for school construction funding is
an issue with which we all agree. Would you agree that reducing the
cost of renovations, additions and new school construction would help
reduce the backlog of schools on the waiting list. What actions do you
think the county can take to reduce costs such as changes in
construction procedures, changes in siting procedures, moving to
"design-build" in bidding out contracts, looking at pre-fabricated
buildings, fighting for reduced regulation from Annapolis regarding
"prevailing wages", etc. Also what do you think the BoE can do to
temper constituent expectations about building what some have described
as "5-star hotel design" school buildings so that scarce resources can
be used for a greater number of school construction projects?
4. When reviewing the system's budget request for FY 2016, will
you look at costs or outcomes, or both? When outcomes are not
supplied, how do you estimate them? When baseline costs are not broken
down by strategy how do you evaluate them? Do you have a standard for
non-instructional costs as a percentage of total costs?
5. Is "equity" spending which directs more resources to schools that need them the most, a sufficient criterion for evaluating program alternatives? How should achievement gap performance goals be factored into the study to improve "bang for the buck"?
6.
In the FY 2015 budget, the Career Lattice Program called for 250
exemplary teachers to
be awarded extra compensation for serving as lead teachers in lower
income schools. Should this pilot program be expanded in FY16? What
would it cost? What are the criteria you would use for expansion?
7.
When the FY 2015 budget was formulated, oil and gas prices were at
record highs. What are the savings accrued from the plummet in prices?
Given that this decrease in prices is likely to continue, will the FY
2016 budget reflect the new scenario?
8.
Given the very high cost of union contracts, does it seem fair that the
very same staff negotiating with the unions benefit from the outcome of
these negotiations? Do you see an inherent conflict of interest here?
Would an independent board lend credibility to the process?
No comments:
Post a Comment
If your comment does not appear in 24 hours, please send your comment directly to our e-mail address:
parentscoalitionmc AT outlook.com