Showing posts with label Feasibility Study. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Feasibility Study. Show all posts

Monday, July 14, 2014

Bullies on MCPS Central Office Staff

When I first heard about MCPS staffers taking pictures of observers at MCPS Board and Committee meetings, I thought I heard the information incorrectly.  Surely, a world class school system run by the pre-eminent Dr. Joshua Starr did not really engage in activities to intimidate a member of the taxpaying public?

Or was this true?

Imagine my dismay to learn that this is not a new practice.

Here is a video clip from a 2011 meeting concerning the feasibility study for BCC Middle School Number 2.  Watch this clip, its short, and you will see Mr. Dennis Cross, who was at the time the project manager for BCC MS #2, snap a picture of a member of the audience after the individual asked a question.



I am intimidated just watching the clip - and its over three years old.

Fortunately for those of us still involved in various aspects of building new school facilities, Mr. Cross is no longer with the school system.  Thank goodness for small miracles.   (See page 10).

Remember the following:

Illegitimi Non Carborundum.

A rough translation?  Don't let the bullies get you down.

Wednesday, August 10, 2011

Farquhar Middle School modernization: A parent's perspective.


On behalf of the Ashton, Sunshine, Sandy Spring, and Olney parents whose children will attend Farquhar Middle School (FMS) I would like to thank the MCPS staff for their work on the FMS Modernization effort. We parents were initially very excited to hear that the much needed FMS modernization feasibility study was underway. This excitement quickly dissipated to dread and united opposition to the (seemingly preferred) options that would require bussing students 1 hour and 10 minutes each way to the Tilden Holding Center. What has transpired over the last four months is a refreshing example of government and community working together to find solutions that truly meet the students’ needs while being sensitive to the greater community. We are again excited with the recommended options that bring a needed modernized middle school with an additional park to the community.

Driven by the knowledge and scientific evidence of the direct and indirect negative impacts of long duration bussing the parents worked very hard with MCPS staff to identify and explore many options looking for innovative solutions. These included solutions that would allow students to remain on-site during construction through technology alternatives and placement of structures to help meet the aggressive Gold LEED standard that MCPS desired to be achieved. It seemed that road block after road block was discovered with stream beds, geo-thermal system requirements, roofing requirements, and the like. We also investigated options that would send the students to other facilities. This included other near by elementary schools, high schools, alternative buildings that are planned to be put in the MCPS inventory for holding centers, splitting the children up among the local middle schools, and even using privately owned school building. All to no avail, each option was assessed by MCPS staff and deemed not feasible or as having too many constraints compared to the Tilden option; further, many parents did not want delays to the modernization so options that pushed the schedule to the right were not palatable.

This left parents very concerned and even more dedicated to finding a good option for the children. It is well known that land along Batchellor’s Forest Road is planned for development so questions as to the plot next to FMS were raised. It was discovered that (in accordance with the Olney Master Plan, 2005) the land is to be dedicated to Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission (M-NCPPC), for use as an active park. The idea of a land-swap was brought to life.

The land-swap option uses land directly adjacent to the existing Farquhar to build the new Farquhar. The existing Farquhar site, upon completion of the new school, would then become the new park. Some have suggested that this option “clearly violates” the 2005 Olney Master Plan; however, it would seem that providing the Olney community an active park with ballfields is consistent with the intent of the Master Plan and delivers on an identified community need that will not likely be achieved in the near future given today’s fiscal constraints. In fact, page 28 of the plan states:
Analysis of recreation resources in Olney, included in the Park and Trail Analysis for the Olney Planning Area, indicates that three additional ballfields are needed in the area. The (see the Parks and Recreation Chapter) 17.4-acre portion of the property is appropriate for ballfields and possibly other active recreation since it is clear with no significant environmental features, and can share its ballfields and parking area with the adjoining middle school site. Access to the ballfields should be from the Old Vic Boulevard extended and through the middle school property.”

MCPS has taken the idea of the land-swap and developed two options that are deemed feasible as documented in the [Draft]  July 2011 FMS Modernization Feasibility Study report. One option is a two story building preferred by the FAC and the other is a three story building preferred by MCPS staff. Developing these options with MCPS staff has been in the spirit of cooperation and democracy that our community aspires to and MCPS is meeting M-NCPPC’s criteria of equal or greater value in a trade with a lot that is 18% larger. Community benefits associated with the land-swap include established amenities, such as ball fields and tennis courts frequented by the community, as well as a parking lot that can also be used during Farquhar events to reduce parking issues on Batchellor’s Forest Road. Furthermore, M-NCPPC and the community will likely have use of a park sooner given the limited budget we are dealing with and cost savings associated with a partially established park. MCPS will also save money by not having a dedicated bus route to the Tilden Holding Center. We are using all our precious resources wisely.

The development and analysis of these options demonstrates the positive outcome that can be achieved in an open and participatory working group. The FMS modernization process has been an example of successful collaboration between the school system and the community. The FAC Committee held publicized open meetings beginning in March 2011, which were well attended by parents and community members. This provided opportunity to address a multitude of suggestions and alternatives from both MCPS staff and the community. The community submitted suggestions and alternative options that were responded to by MCPS staff, presented, and posted online for the community to read and respond.

The resultant recommendations deliver to the Olney community a needed park with existing ballfield and protect “rural open space” and the “low-density character of the Southeast Quadrant”. It is clear that the land-swap options (both the 2-story and the 3-story) are the best option for Farquhar modernization, because only they option meet all of the following community needs:
  • Keep kids & families in the community during modernization, avoiding LONG bus rides to Bethesda,
  • Avoid $1.5 million in transportation costs,
  • Maintain the rural feel of the school’s road – the new building can stay two stories vs. three for an “on-site” option, and
  • Jump-start the building of a planned park in Olney – one that will have fields, tennis courts, or even possibly a gym ready-made, saving taxpayer dollars on park construction
Many in our community including, the following, endorse the land-swap:
  • homeowners Associations located within the Farquhar Middle School boundary,
  • all PTAs from the feeder elementary schools and Farquhar Middle School,
  • the Mid-County Citizens Advisory Board,
  • State Senator Karen Montgomery, District 14,
  • State Delegate Anne Kaiser, District 14,and
  • State Senator Roger Manno, District 19.
Certainly, details will need to be worked out to ensure that the implementation (i.e., access to the school, traffic flow, etc…) conforms to the Master plan and the concerns of SEROCA and the local residents are addressed.

It is not often that a parent’s group can publicly thank MCPS, so I am particularly thrilled to be able to do. MCPS staff was open in dialog with the community and addressed our concerns through modernization feasibility study process.

Jennifer McKneely
Member of Future Farquhar Community Coalition and Sherwood Elementary School Parent

Tuesday, August 9, 2011

GOCA: Farquhar Middle plans don’t conform to Olney master plan

For the record, the Greater Olney Civic Association [GOCA] is on record as opposing the busing of Farquhar students to the Tilden Holding School in Rockville. Our delegates feel it is not in the students' best interest.We have not endorsed any of the remaining options being considered by Montgomery County Public Schools in its recently published Modernization Feasibility Study Draft for the Farquhar Middle School. We are quite concerned about this process and how the voices of an entire community have not been heard.Although we recognize that a master plan does not have the effect of law, we have always been staunch defenders of the Olney Master Plan; many of our officers and delegates were instrumental in developing the language of the current (2005) revision. The Olney community has relied on what the master plan says and the need to adhere to this plan to promote orderly development and maintain an overall vision of what Olney should be.The feasibility study is endorsing a "land swap" option with a 17.2-acre property, formerly part of the Casey Property, adjacent to Farquhar Middle School that is designated to become a local park. While this may seem a simple solution on the surface, it opens a myriad of concerns...
Read entire letter to Gazette from GOCA here.

Friday, August 5, 2011

Gazette: Two design choices revealed for Wheaton, Edison high schools


Wheaton High School football field


Schools could remain merged or separate, but costs similar for both
As Montgomery County’s school board considers ways to modernize Wheaton and Edison high schools, Silver Spring residents are pushing for separate buildings... 
article continues here.

Tuesday, July 19, 2011

Send your comments yesterday! Wheaton - Edison Feasibility Study

What a great way to include the public: notify them after the comment period starts, in the middle of the summer, and only give them 18 days to get a copy of the plans, discuss and comment! Does the Board of Education hope that everyone is on vacation? 




----Original Message-----
From: Donnie Porter <dporter@gparch.com>
Sent: Tue, Jul 19, 2011 7:41 am
Subject: Edison-Wheaton Feasibility Study


Dear FAC Members,
 
The draft of the feasibility study for the modernization of Wheaton High School and Thomas Edison High School of Technology is now available.  Due to the size of the brochure, it could not be sent via email; therefore, it is available on the Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS) Division of Construction website and the Wheaton High School and Thomas Edison High School of Technology website.  FAC members, as well as the general public, will have from July 18, 2011 to August 5, 2011 to submit comments on the feasibility study.  All comments should be sent to Dennis Cross at dennis_cross@mcpsmd.org. The feasibility study for the modernization of Wheaton High School and Thomas Edison High School of Technology is scheduled as a discussion/action item at the Board of Education’s August 25, 2011 meeting.
 
Should you have any questions, please contact Mr. Cross at 240-314-1012.  Thank you.
 
Links to websites:
 
 
 
 
 
Don Porter, AIA
Vice President
11720 Beltsville Drive, Suite 600
Calverton, Maryland  20705
(301) 595-1000
(301) 595-0089 FAX
(240) 965-0713 (Direct)