Showing posts with label Steve Zepnick. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Steve Zepnick. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 4, 2013

A Video You Won't Find on the MCPS Website

Superintendent Starr puts up lots of video of himself on the MCPS website, but somehow the November 25th meeting with parents of children with special education needs was not videotaped by MCPS.  
The Parents' Coalition brings you video of that event with commentary by Steve Zepnick.
Does Dispute Resolution Work In Almost Every Case?
by Steve Zepnick

At the open forum on Special Education on 11/25/13, Dr. Starr thinks so. He stated that in the past, districts “gave away the store” to avoid disputes. He mentioned that MCPS needs to leverage the time and energy invested by parents of children with disabilities to become deeply engaged with the parents. However, he falsely reported that “dispute resolution works in almost every case” and presented the lack of successful resolutions to be only .65%. This number is understated. It does not include families, who were intimidated to take less or those who dropped out or just didn’t choose to fight because of the of the costly, complicated process. Hiding behind a .65% statistical distortion only muddles the picture.

Wednesday, November 27, 2013

"Equity Warrior" Starr Admits Being Comfortable Spending Hundreds of Thousands to Fight Disabled Kids

The Gazette reported the following exchange between Joshua Starr, self-proclaimed "Equity Warrior," and the grandparent of a special needs child:

Steve Zepnick, who said he was advocating for his 10-year-old grandson, asked Starr if he thought the dispute process should be examined and parents consulted to see what changes might be necessary.

Starr said a very small percentage of special education families request dispute resolution with the school system.

In some cases, it’s impossible for the the school system and families to agree, he said.

“I’m comfortable with where we are right now, I am,” he said. “The numbers are really, really solid.”

*******************

So let's look at the details of Joshua Starr's comfort level. Here's a sample from just one month earlier this spring:





And here's the most recent end of the year summary: $308,000 spent fighting families' requests for services for their children with special needs. And that's on top of the cost of the in house counsel Zvi Greismann, and the cost of the Equity Assurance and Compliance Unit.

Are YOU comfortable with your own tax dollars being used in this way?

Monday, December 10, 2012

Guest Post: The Blurred IEP Role of the School Health Nurse

by Steve Zepnick

During the IEP (Individualized Education Plan/Program) process, parents are rarely informed of the specific nature of the role of the school health nurse. There is enough vagueness to the role that MCPS can use the opinions of the nurse to counteract the recommendations of a child’s physician. 

According to the County Government Administration, School Health nurses are employees of the Montgomery County Department of Health and Human Services but acting “under the direction” of the MCPS IEP team when they participate in the IEP process. During this process, the County Government Administration states that they have no authority to direct the actions of school health staff in the IEP proceedings.

The school health assessments are designed to be narrowly focused on whether or not health care needs can be met in the school setting and what level of nursing support is available by School Health Services. The nurse is not supposed to make recommendations on program or school placements for students. Furthermore, the County Government states that the school health nurse should not be relied on to provide “expert” opinions on the student’s overall medical condition.

So, who is it that ensures that appropriate limits are maintained by the nurses during a disputed IEP process, especially when MCPS disagrees with the recommendations of a child’s physician? The use of a School Health Nurse as a MCPS expert witness in a due process procedure, guided by the MCPS attorney, seems to blur the role and causes confusion for the parents and the administrative law judge. Clarification of the role conflict is definitely needed. In my grandson’s due process hearing, the nurse, in my opinion, was inappropriately allowed to challenge the recommendations of a minimum of three, attending, pediatric specialists.

Monday, November 5, 2012

Jay Mathews: "This is against Post policy..."

In his column today in The Washington Post, Jay Mathews wrote about litigation involving the MCPS Board of Education and an elementary school student.  

In the comments to the article, I mentioned that Mr. Mathews has been known to run his articles by the MCPS Public Relations department for their review prior to publication.

Here is Mr. Mathews' response to my comment:

For jz---I have met many fine parents who think the solution is to demonize the school system. They have done that. It hasn't produced better results. Isn't it time to try something else? As for proofing my piece with the school system, I appreciate the chance to restate my fact-checking procedures, which are not popular with many journalists but work well for me. I show everything I write for publication to all sources to check for errors. This is against Post policy but the Post has granted me a waiver under that policy. I have been doing this for 27 years. I think it has made my stories more accurate. I find even people I am criticizing appreciate the chance to make sure I have my facts right. In this case I did show the story in advance both to the school system officials and to Seth's family. The family spokesman, Steve Zepnick, told me they were happy with the result.

Monday, October 29, 2012

Guest Post: The "special" relationship between MCPS and HHS


School Health Services - Cursory Assessments
by Steve Zepnick

To determine appropriate academic placements for children with medical needs, MCPS routinely requests hundreds of evaluations to be performed by School Health Services under the Montgomery County Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).  According to HHS, “The evaluations are performed by nurses, who do not medically evaluate the child but rather review records to make an assessment and determination of what level of support is needed from a school health perspective.”

This assessment is significant to plan for the appropriate placement of a child but, on occasions, it has been used by MCPS to deny special placements.  There is no policy that requires: MCPS to inform the parents that the School Health nurse is an employee of HHS and what steps can be taken for an appeal; the nurse to see or observe the child; to consult with the parents; or, to call the child’s attending physicians.  The evaluation is not even co-signed by the Health Officer.  On one occasion, a family had to demand that the nurse contact the child’s physician and then document her one hour contact.  When the nurse finally consented to document (7 mos. later), she recorded only 4-5 sentences that included an incorrect diagnosis!  When the family asked for a HHS review, the family was told by an administrator “that the nurse managers were interviewed and were very comfortable with their recommendations.”  

How would you feel if you received a medical or psychological “assessment” and the evaluator never interviewed you but wrote a report by only reviewing other reports? What if the assessment had a deleterious effect on your application for employment or needed social services?  Cursory assessments are unprofessional and harmful.  This process needs to be reviewed by both Departments for corrective action rather than ignoring parents’ complaints.  How many families of special needs children have already been harmed by this “special” relationship between MCPS and HHS?