it’s “absolutely clear” that the development proposal request had a requirement that a developer find a solution for moving the [MCPS bus]depot.

Plan for school district bus depot’s next home remains hazy

...Greg Ossont, deputy director of the county’s Department of General Services, said developers pitched ideas in their proposals, but “none of them offered us a panacea.” Developers under consideration could increase their bid in lieu of offering both money and land for the depot, he said.
Elrich, however, said it’s “absolutely clear” that the development proposal request had a requirement that a developer find a solution for moving the depot.
“I guess I’m curious as to why we didn’t hold them to the terms of the deal,” he said.
The request said the bus depot now fills 35 acres, but “developers may not need to identify the same total number of acres and the county will consider multiple sites of fewer acres.”
A developer wouldn’t be expected to design or construct facilities on a new site, the request says.
Ossont said the language was meant to help developers offer more viable proposals for relocating the bus depot, but it wasn’t an obligation.
Elrich said the county should adjust the sale date, so developers don’t get the land until they find a depot solution...

 http://www.gazette.net/article/20150304/NEWS/150309764/1022/plan-for-school-district-bus-depot-x2019-s-next-home-remains-hazy&template=gazette