Showing posts with label Tom Hucker. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tom Hucker. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 25, 2022

MoCo County Council Forgets to Check Backgrounds on Top Candidates for Planning Board.

This week the Montgomery County Council is setting a really bad example for students. They forgot to do their homework.  

In this case that means that the County Council released a list of the names of their "top" candidates to fill the vacant Montgomery County Planning Board seats without researching the candidates.

Just a few simple Internet searches would have yielded important information, such as tax liens.   

Why do personal liens matter on candidates for Planning Board positions? It's always a concern to put someone in a position of power that might have some vulnerabilities related to their personal financial status.  

Not only did they County Council forget to do their homework on their "top" candidates, but they are also blatantly violating Maryland law with regard to the appointment process for Planning Board vacancies.  

This week the Montgomery County Council is hell bent on showing the next generation how to violate the law, eliminate transparency and ignore ethics. Is their goal to show future generations what not to do? 

Friday, May 6, 2022

Councilmember Tom Hucker: "heard complaints... other bidders...were local felt like status as local & minority owned...wasn't given appropriate number of points..." #MCPSElectricSchoolBuses


On March 29, 2022, 
the Montgomery County Council discussed funding for a new MCPS bus depot.  

During the discussion Councilmember Tom Hucker states that he was recently speaking at a national conference and heard complaints about the MCPS electric bus procurement. Video below and at this link

Councilmember Hucker says he spoke with companies who could have bid on the MCPS Electric School Bus proposal but didn't, and companies who bid on the proposal and were rejected. 




In the video clip below, Councilmember Hucker is speaking to Montgomery County Director of General Services David E. Dise.
 

Tuesday, January 25, 2022

TODAY - @ Jan 25, 2022 Work Session - Council's voting on 2 BAD Resolutions, which FUEL conflicts between neighbors

TODAY - @ Jan 25, 2022 Work Session - Council's voting on 2 BAD Resolutions, which FUEL conflicts between neighbors; EXCLUDE those already socioeconomically disadvantaged and marginalized, and often persons of color; and SADDLE residents-taxpayers, rather than industry-applicants with the bulk of the County’s costs for small cell tower reviews. 

See details at Public Hearing Testimony on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=83rAefR5GkM: min. mark 6:55 –– Sue Present; and min. mark 14:52 –– Rick Meyer.

Friday, January 21, 2022

MCCPTA President and others accused of "back-door politics to publicly discredit" Monifa McKnight. @mcps @mocoboe @MCC_PTA @tomhucker @Lynne4Students @JMartinMCEA @MCAAPMD

 January 18, 2022

Open Letter to the Montgomery County Board of Education:

It has been just over a week since the passing of Dr. Lani Guinier, the heralded African American female attorney whose innovative and provocative writings on racial justice and voting rights were used to undermine her nomination to lead the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division. Today, we are witnessing a similar political attempt to destroy another professionally qualified woman of color, Dr. Monifa McKnight. She is being strategically and unjustly vilified during her candidacy to be the next Montgomery County Public Schools Superintendent. We will not stand by and watch this happen again.  

We wish to call attention to the uneven and unfair treatment of Interim Superintendent Dr. Monifa McKnight, who answered the call to leadership amid the COVID-19 pandemic that has confounded governmental and private sector leaders to say nothing of school officials across the country. Constituent criticism is to be expected by any leader, but the potshots being taken against Dr. McKnight, by politicians who know all-to-well the complexities of balancing safety with public services, suggest an untoward motive at play. We are particularly aghast at leaders who purport themselves to represent marginalized communities of color and women taking part in these bad faith practices. 

The strategic and coordinated attack of some elected officials and affinity groups suggests an ulterior motive to negatively influence the selection of the next superintendent of schools. Interim Superintendent Dr. McKnight has the credentials, experience, and in-depth knowledge to compete for the position of Superintendent without internal and external influences that appear to be compromising the selection process.  

Specifically, the presidents of the Montgomery County Parent Teacher Association, Montgomery County Education Association, and the Montgomery County Association of Administrators and Principals, Council Member Tom Hucker, Board of Education Member Lynne Harris, and County Executive Marc Elrich appear to be engaging in back-door politics to publicly discredit the Interim Superintendent. We recognize this is an election year and that people join forces for self-interest, but there is never an acceptable time to target one individual for political gain. We demand that these persons and others stand down from further combative actions. 

The Board of Education members have a responsibility to model fairness and integrity for our children and students who are watching, the staff who are seeking direction, and the community that expects the core values of the school system to be carried out by its leadership. We recognize the difficulty in selecting a leader of such a large and diverse region and pray for the wisdom and fortitude of those tasked with making a decision that will impact so many families. 

We are resolute for a fully fair and just process that charts a way forward for all of Montgomery County, not merely the areas of privilege. Not only do we urge that Dr. McKnight’s candidacy is not tarnished in the eyes of the Board of Education, but that those who have acted in an unjust manner are held accountable. As leaders within this community, we believe it is our burden of responsibility to call out injustice, particularly in the wake of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.’s Holiday who famously said, “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.”


Respectfully submitted,

Senior Pastor Matthew Watley

Kingdom Fellowship AME Church

Silver Spring, MD

Senior Pastor Essentino Lewis

Clifton Park Baptist Church

Silver Spring, MD 

Senior Pastor James E. Boney

President, Ministerial Alliance

Faith Community Baptist Church

Silver Spring, MD 

Senior Pastor Jamison Hunter

Mt. Jezreel Baptist Church  

Silver Spring, MD  


Senior Pastor Marcus Jerkins

Resurrection Baptist Church

Silver Spring, MD


Senior Pastor Haywood A. Robinson III

The People’s Community Baptist Church

Silver Spring, MD


Sunday, January 9, 2022

Video of Tom Hucker's Emergency Virtual Townhall on Schools

 Video of Tom Hucker's Emergency Virtual Townhall on Schools on January 9, 2022.

https://fb.watch/ar8k8mENOw/

Over 3000 live viewers during the meeting.  Many teachers and parents spoke.  No sign of Superintendent McKnight.


Friday, July 23, 2021

MONDAY JULY 26th: County Council Press Conference on Vote to Put 50,000 Cell Towers in Neighborhoods and Next to Schools


Council President Hucker and Vice President Albornoz to hold media availability July 26 at noon to discuss early voting event, the Council’s upcoming vote on zoning changes for 5G wireless infrastructure and new legislation to eliminate no-rehire clauses

For Immediate Release: Friday, July 23, 2021

Vice President Gabe Albornoz will hold a media availability to discuss Monday’s Early Voting Community Celebration at the White Oak Community Recreation Center in Silver Spring, the Council’s upcoming vote on Zoning Text Amendment (ZTA) 19-07 - Telecommunications Towers, which is scheduled for July 27, and other Council related matters. Council President Hucker will also discuss his new bill to eliminate no-rehire clauses in County settlement agreements with employees.

Montgomery County Health and Human Services Deputy Health Officer Dr. James Bridgers will join the media availability to provide a public health update.

The media availability will be held via Zoom and is for credentialed members of the media.

The public can watch on the Council’s Facebook page (@MontgomeryCountyMdCouncil).

Members of the media must RSVP before 11 a.m. on July 26 to Sonya Healy at Sonya.Healy@montgomerycountymd.gov to receive the Zoom login information.

For more information contact: Sonya Healy, legislative information officer, at Sonya.Healy@montgomerycountymd.gov or 240-328-2069.

Genevieve Kurtz, communications director, Office of Council President Hucker at Genevieve.Kurtz@montgomerycountymd.gov or 240-777-7937.



###

Release ID: 21-304
Media Contact: Sonya Healy 240-777-7926 , Genevieve Kurtz 240-777-7937
Categories: Gabe AlbornozTom Hucker


REMINDER:  There has been ONLY ONE public forum to discuss Montgomery County allowing cell towers to be put in front yards and next to schools.  Here is the news coverage of that one public forum.  Montgomery County residents were not happy with this proposal.

Homeowners Oppose Cell Tower Proposal in Montgomery County


Monday, August 12, 2019

Montgomery County Council's 8 minute 7 second Discussion of IG 30 Page Report on School Bus Camera Scheme

Here is the Montgomery County Council's response to the July 28, 2019, Inspector General's Report on the school bus camera scheme being used by Montgomery County Public Schools.  This discussion came at the end of the Council's Joint Committee meeting on July 29th.

Councilmember Tom Hucker begins to ask questions to MCPS and Montgomery County Police Representatives based on the Inspector General's Report, however the discussion is quickly shut down and the meeting is adjourned.



At the table presenting to the Councilmembers are:

• Assistant Chief David Anderson, Field Services Bureau, Montgomery County Police
Department (MCPD)
• Captain Tom Didone, Traffic Division, MCPD
• Richard Hetherington, Manager Automated Traffic Enforcement Unit, MCPD
• Todd Watkins, Transportation Director, Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Monday, July 22, 2019

Takoma Park doubles down on antisemitism

The Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Washington (JCRC) has just released an update on the vicious antisemitic film that the Takoma Park city government, funded by county and city taxpayers, will be showing this week. Takoma Park, supported by their residents, have invited a speaker who espouses violence against Jews, and has stated that, “Israelis have to be bombed, they are a threat to the legitimacy of Palestine, and it is wrong to maintain the State of Israel. It is an illegitimate creation born from colonialism and racism.” The speaker has participated in numerous disruptive activities in the U.S. We suppose this fits very well with Takoma Park city councilmember Peter Kovar's statement that there are, "...all the different sides."

At the public hearing last week, Takoma Park Mayor Kate Stewart stated that the city had engaged Theo Brown, who we suppose invited this speaker for a 'balanced' perspective on the antisemitic movie. This program is endorsed by the city council and the mayor as was made clear at the hearing last week and will be paid for by county and city taxpayers.

The Montgomery County council, while issuing a letter, has not directly called for the antisemitic film to be cancelled. And Tom Hucker, (D-District 5, which represents Takoma Park) did not sign the council's letter.

Sunday, January 27, 2019

Is crumb rubber a source for pollutants and harmful effects in the marine environment?

For our elected officials who still need to be 'educated' about the deadly environmental effects of crumb rubber artificial turf fields.

Paper by Claudia Halsband-Lenk,of the NILU - Norwegian Institute for Air Research, delivered at the Norwegian Environmental Toxicology Symposium, March 2018.

Link here.

Abstract
In Norwegian coastal communities, rubber microplastic granules (≤ 5 mm in size) derived from discarded vehicle tires are used in large quantities on outdoor synthetic turf sports pitches. Through transport by waste water effluents and terrestrial runoff, these rubber particles are considered a significant source of MPs to the marine ecosystem. In the here presented interdisciplinary project we study the composition, degradation and environmental impacts of these rubber granules from locations in northern Norway and Svalbard. Their persistence and residence time in the Arctic marine environment is unknown. These rubber particles pose a potential health risk for arctic wild life through direct ingestion, especially at the base of the marine food chain, but may also provide an exposure route for toxic additive chemicals present in tires to marine organisms. Furthermore, the rubber particles may act as a vector for other persistent organic and heavy metal pollutants already present in the marine environment. Arctic marine environments present special abiotic conditions for the degradation of these particles, with cold water temperatures and long periods with unlimited sunlight. During a 12 months period, rubber crumbs were placed out in the ocean in stainless steel containers and sub-sampled continuously for the measurement of persistent organic pollutants, metals and additives. Hydrophobic persistent organic pollutants such as PAHs, PCBs, DDTs, bisphenols, as well as metals were measured to establish the adsorption and leaching kinetics in seawater under in situ conditions. Samples were extracted using ultrasound and nonpolar solvents, followed by GPC and SPE clean up. Chemical analyses using pyroGC/MS, GC/MS/MS and LC/HRMS were done in the laboratories of NILU, Tromsø and SINTEF, Trondheim. Exposure experiments with rubber leachate were also conducted and high mortality rates were found for different marine zooplankton species.

Wednesday, May 30, 2018

Judge: President can’t block critics on Twitter

...Jameel Jaffer, the Knight Institute’s executive director, said in a release that his organization was pleased.
“The president’s practice of blocking critics on Twitter is pernicious and unconstitutional, and we hope this ruling will bring it to an end,” he said.
The lawsuit was filed after Trump blocked some individuals from @realdonaldtrump, a 9-year-old Twitter account with over 50 million followers.
Justice Department lawyers had argued that it was Trump’s prerogative, no different from the president deciding in a room filled with people not to listen to some.
Buchwald ruled that the tweets were made in a public forum.
“The President presents the @realDonaldTrump account as being a presidential account as opposed to a personal account and, more importantly, uses the account to take actions that can be taken only by the President as President,” the judge said...

Tuesday, May 22, 2018

Councilmember Tom Hucker has outside part-time job. In 2016, Hucker said: "...we're all grownups and can make good decisions about our time..."

...“In addition, unlike the incumbent, I pledge not to collect any outside income other than my Council salary.”
Harris is referring to Hucker’s position at the Natural Resources Defense Council, an environmental advocacy organization in Washington, D.C.
As a councilmember, Hucker made $120,825 in 2016, according to a county employee website. The council job is deemed a full-time position...
http://marylandreporter.com/2018/05/21/20-montgomery-candidates-approved-for-public-financing-system-four-hang-in-balance/
Remember the Montgomery County Council Retreat in 2016: 

Floreen on public hearings run by Committees:  Floreen thinks all public hearings should be before the full Council.  Councilmembers are not "up to speed on issues" when they do not attend public hearings.

Riemer:  "immediate impact on schedule" with evening public hearings... "limit number of nights I go out during the week..."

Hucker:  "...we're all grownups and can make good decisions about our time..."

See the video of the Council's 2016 Retreat at this link:

Thursday, March 8, 2018

Floreen to Berliner: “This is not a game! You cannot have it both ways, my friend. I mean, what are you smoking?”

WASHINGTON — A long-delayed transportation project aimed at relieving traffic congestion in the White Flint area of North Bethesda, Maryland, could face further delays due to a move Thursday by the Montgomery County Council’s transportation committee.

By a 2-to-1 vote, the committee declared that construction work on Montrose Parkway East should be pushed back by three years. The recommendation now heads to the full council...

...The project, which has already been delayed by eight years, would stretch between Rockville Pike and Veirs Mill Road.
Under the plan laid out by “the three amigos,” construction would be moved from 2021 to 2024, freeing up more than $94 million...

Wednesday, January 3, 2018

Request for MoCo Tower Committee to Table Inaccurate, Incomplete Applications (Including Blair HS) and to Include Public Comment in Process as Per MoCo Regulation COMCOR 02.58E.01.05(b)

Today, the Montgomery County Transmission Facility Coordinator Group (Tower Committee) is meeting at 2 PM to consider a number of applications from cell tower vendors.  Among the applications to be considered today are a number of very large radio/cell towers on or near fire stations around the County.  

These applications appear to be going before the Tower Committee without public notice, review or input.  The Parents' Coalition made these applications public just yesterday.  Why didn't Montgomery County make these applications public?  

In reviewing these applications we have discovered that one of these new very tall towers is slated to be constructed on the Montgomery Blair High School baseball field.  To date, no school communities have supported the construction of a cell tower on public school land.  Many MCPS schools have been very vocal about their opposition to these commercial construction projects on school land.  What is the position of the Blair High School parents?  What is the position of the neighbors of Blair High School?  

Below is an e-mail sent today from Sue Present to the Tower Committee asking that these applications be tabled due to inaccurate information, incomplete information, and due to the absence of community notice and opportunity to comment as per Montgomery County Regulations. 




From: suepresent 
Date: Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 11:06 AM
Subject: PLEASE POSTPONE REVIEW OF ALL MCRCS APPLICATIONS FOR NEW TOWERS/MONOPOLES
To: "Williams, Marjorie"
Cc: "Schaeffer, Matt" , "Bowser, Ted" , "Niblock, David" , frookard@wsscwater.com, Gregory.russ@montgomeryplanning.org, "Williamson, Thomas A." , Boyd_Lawrence@mcpsmd.org, Ike Leggett , "Miller, Judy" , WPCA , "Morgan, Carl" , "Segal, Sonny" , "Royalty, Clifford"


Dear Margie,

Please POSTPONE THE REVIEW OF ALL MCRCS APPLICATIONS FOR NEW TOWERS AND MONOPOLES.

I appreciate your having released the applications for the new radio communications towers, yesterday. There has been woefully insufficient time to thoroughly examine these applications, which are on today’s agenda. However, in focusing my attention on TFCG application 201712-05, the one that is identified for Fire Station 16, I have already discovered significant flaws/concerns.

1)      Co-location Opportunity. The applicants identify the co-location alternatives that they dismissed within a 2-mile radius, and explain their rationale. They identify a lattice tower registered to MNCPPC, which the application says is 265’ in height, and explain that they dismiss it because as a radio broadcast tower it is “hot.”

Presumably, this is the 247’-high (not 265’ high) radio broadcast tower that is located at Sligo Creek Golf Course. It is the tower at which Verizon received the TFCG’s “recommendation of application 201612-05 to attach twelve 72'-high panel antennas at the 120' level, and the Planning Board subsequently approved the installation. Thus, for Verizon, the radio tower being “hot” was not an issue.

As is explained in the applicant response dated December 13, 2017, to meet the applicant’s need for this proposed radio communications, the attachments are needed at a height on the structure of 180’.  Under the circumstances, this applicant provides inadequate clarification as to why it cannot attach at the equivalent height (which I presume to be approximately 197’ on the nearby 247’ Sligo Creek Golf Course radio tower) when Verizon has already demonstrated its ability to attach to the Sligo Golf Course radio tower.

2)      Land Authorizations. In my previous communication to the Tower Committee, dated December 29, 2017, I alerted the Committee to the restrictive covenant governing Blair Local Park (and attached a copy). At the time of that message I was uncertain of the proposed location. It now seems evident that the plan is to locate the very large monopole on Blair Local Park. But, as previously explained, the restrictive covenant prohibits the use of the Blair Local Park land for any use other than Public Open Space. The proposed radio tower use is thus prohibited without modifications to the restrictive covenant. 

In addition, I raised concerns about easements. The application (overall site plan C-2) references “existing easement.” The easements, which of course were improperly conferred with the original Nextel/Sprint lease, indicated that they would cease when the telecommunications facilities became “obsolete.” The telecommunications facilities became obsolete when the lease was terminated and all telecommunications facilities were removed from the property, and the structure took on the sole purpose of a light standard, in 2015. There are no current easements in the County Land Records. I assert that without proper State authorization, any easements that would facilitate a communications tower would contravene the restrictive covenant.

3)      Monopole Height. The applicant’s justification – identifying other prospective users and the wishes of the manager of the land (for whom there would be greater revenue generated from the higher tower) – is inadequate for the monopole height of 195’. The facts demonstrate that the applicant’s needs can be met with a structure no higher than 180’ in height.

Although speculative, the additional information provided in this application that supports the State Highway Administration’s interest in communication space at this approximate location should bolster further exploration of siting on the substantial SHA parcel that abuts Fire Station 16 and Blair Local Park, between University Blvd. E. and the beltway, or upon other even more appropriate State Highway land.
Based upon these comments and those that you have received from a few other members of the public, it appears that the Tower Coordinator did not adhere to COMCOR 02.58E.01.05 in “recommending” to the TFCG the location of Blair Local Park for this monopole. Adequate consideration has not been given, per that regulation, for:
·        zoning standards for siting a telecommunications transmission facility;
·        effect of the telecommunications transmission facility on the land owning agency;
·        co-location options; and
·        potential impacts on the surrounding area(s).

And, you have received direct comments from only a few members of the public. That is because there has been no public process of notification and public input for almost all of these proposed facilities)as noted in my previous message, the land owner(s) failed to follow COMCOR 02.58E.01.05(b).

So, I urge the Tower Committee to POSTPONE the review of TFCG application 201612-05 and of all the applications on today’s agenda for NEW MCRCS Telecommunications Towers/Monopoles to provide for the Land Owning Agencies, the Tower Coordinator, and the Tower Committee to adhere to all regulations articulated in COMCOR 02.58E. Postponing these applications would provide the applicant a necessary do-over. The County needs to provide the surrounding communities where these facilities are proposed with appropriate due process, and to treat them with respect, too.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sue Present

Thursday, November 2, 2017

NYT: Why Does Verizon Care About Telephone Poles?

Sam Liccardo is the mayor of San Jose, Calif., and a member of the Federal Communications Commission’s Broadband Development Advisory Committee.


SAN JOSE, Calif. — Like every other 8-year-old whom I tutored at a local school, Omar didn’t know anything — and didn’t care much — about high-stakes disputes over net neutrality, free speech and privacy that have consumed much of the news coverage of the telecommunications industry in recent years. Yet the inability of Omar’s parents to afford broadband internet access lies at the heart of a battle that will have a far greater impact on his future: the fight over street poles.
Public street poles may not look like much, but to wireless service providers, they’re valuable real estate. Companies like Verizon want low-cost access to them to install equipment to handle the rapidly growing demand for mobile data. But poles are owned locally, and cities and counties aren’t eager to give away access at below-market rates. Doing so would essentially subsidize an already wealthy industry — nationwide, as much as $2 billion a year, money that could otherwise go to expanding low-cost broadband access for people like Omar’s family.
As a result, the industry is waging a war for those poles, at all levels. Big Telecom and its allies in the White House have quietly carried out a campaign to secure rapid and cheap access to those poles, at taxpayer expense. Here in California, state legislators recently advanced a bill introduced by Senator Ben Hueso that would allow wireless service providers to install their equipment on public street poles at below-market rates — and to do so nearly wherever and whenever they choose — all in the name of “streamlining” local permit approvals.
We’ve seen similar efforts in Texas, Florida, Washington and dozens of other states, where telecommunications industry lobbyists spent more than $24.5 million in campaign contributions last year, according to the National Institute on Money in State Politics. At the federal level, Trump administration appointees to the Federal Communications Commission have publicly cheered these proposals, while releasing their own draft regulations to carry out additional industry-friendly rules nationally...
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/03/opinion/wireless-verizon-telephone-poles.html

Wednesday, November 2, 2016

Berliner, Hucker & Katz want to Eliminate Office of People's Counsel, Because Why Should the Public Have Any Representation in the Planning Process?


A Bill has been proposed (without consultation with communities) to permanently abolish the Office of the People's Counsel from the County Code and replace it with a Resource Officer that would not be allowed to participate in hearings.

The Montgomery County Civic Federation (MCCF) pushed hard to establish this office and it was finally placed in the County Code in 1990.  The funding for the Office of People's Counsel in 2008 was $246,000 for 1.8 positions. In 2010 the Montgomery County Council removed funding for this important office ostensibly for fiscal reasons.

MCCF pushed hard to establish this office and it was finally placed in the County Code in 1990.  The funding for the Office of People's Counsel in 2008 was $246,000 for 1.8 positions. In 2010 The County Council removed funding for this important office ostensibly for fiscal reasons.

Take the time to read the testimony from the MCCF and then send a note to the County Council asking them to reestablish funding for the Office of People's Counsel, not just a resource officer.

In the MCCF testimony it shows that the 3 development ombudsmen/coordinator positions ($577,000) that have been funded since the time that the Office of People's Counsel was defunded, are being funding with Montomgery County Department of Transportation Capital Improvement funds.  Yes, we are using debt service to pay for public positions that assist developers but the County Council (Berliner, Hucker, Katz) does not want to fund the position that is supposed to represent the public interest. 




Thursday, May 26, 2016

Council's Education Comm. will Take Up State Audit of MCPS while You are on Vacation

According to a message posted on Facebook today by Montgomery County Councilmember Marc Elrich, the Council's Education Committee will be discussing the 2016 Maryland State Office of Legislative Audits report on Montgomery County Public Schools sometime in August.  No date has been set yet for this discussion.

August is traditionally a time when many Montgomery County families take vacations.  Obviously, the Council wants to make sure you are out of town when the 2016 MCPS Audit is discussed.
The Council does not want you to see any news reports about the Audits findings or hear MCPS' response that the State auditors are wrong in their findings.

So let the Council know when your family will be out of town this summer so they can safely schedule a discussion of the 2016 State audit of MCPS when the least number of County residents will be in the County.   

County.Council@montgomerycountymd.gov


Sunday, November 1, 2015

The Real Montgomery County: How Council and County Exec Treat Non-Cocktail Party Residents - 45 Minute Walk to Nearest Bus Stop

Residents in this community have been asking for their bus service to be restored since 1997!


October 30, 2015

Concealed in a grove off River Road near the C&O Canal, the community is a more-than-45-minute walk from the nearest bus stop on Travilah Road. Because several residents lack personal transportation — or the money to fuel their cars — many must tread the dangerously narrow thoroughfare on dark mornings just to get to the bus...

... (The county cut an after-school program at the same time.)

 https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/a-neighborhood-in-need-of-a-bus/2015/10/30/1b3428ea-7cd5-11e5-beba-927fd8634498_story.html