Showing posts with label IQinVision. Show all posts
Showing posts with label IQinVision. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 30, 2019

School apps track students from the classroom to bathroom, and parents are struggling to keep up

...Some schools, like those in the Montgomery County public school district in Rockville, Md., are more receptive to parents policing their children’s technology. Ellen Zavian, a lawyer and professor at George Washington University Law School, has cleared her middle-school aged son to use Google’s education software, but not ClassDojo.
“At the beginning of every school year I send the principal what my son’s allowed to be on and what he’s not allowed to be on, and thus far my local schools have been incredibly supportive and have been willing to learn from me as I have been willing to learn from them,” Zavian said. “My goal is to give my child the smallest footprint possible, to give him the largest opportunity possible.”..
...Privacy attorney Brad Shear has two elementary-age kids in the Montgomery County schools. He has been vocal about parental privacy rights and successfully lobbied the district to adopt an annual “data deletion week.” Now, the school purges any unnecessary data about students from tools like Google’s education suite, keeping essential information such as grades.
However, if the district does decide to test e-Hallpass in more schools, Shear and other parents are ready to mobilize against it.
“I will not allow this app to be utilized in my kids’ schools, period. If the app ends up getting rolled out I will make sure that I get the PTA involved,” Shear said. “This is bathroom big brother.”

Wednesday, July 30, 2014

New Council Report Reveals Complaints about MCPS Procurement Process


On July 29, 2014, the Montgomery County Council released a report from their Office of Legislative Oversight entitled Procurement and Small, Minority, Female, Disabled and Locally-Owned Businesses.  The Council requested this project in order to examine the County’s procurement process, particularly for small and minority, female, disabled, or locally-owned businesses. Appendix F of this report contains comments from businesses. A number of the businesses commented on the MCPS procurement process even though this report is limited to Montgomery County procurement. 

The comments about MCPS are interesting coming on the heels of the MSI Soccer litigation against the Board of Education concerning the procurement process for selecting artificial turf field partners. 

Over the last 8 years the Parents' Coalition has documented a number of these same issues cited by these businesses.  

Will the Montgomery County Council pay any attention to the comments in this report?

  • I have two complaints. Montgomery County based businesses should get priority. Perhaps a 5% advantage. The printing supply bid for MCPS schools should be put out every year and not be rolled over for three years.
  • Montgomery County Schools, college and other agencies that procure institutional style educational furniture, primarily purchase everything from ONLY 1 or 2 vendors. Many local county vendors never get an opportunity to participate. Procurement policy discourages competition. Purchases are almost exclusively made through the state's BRCPC contract or agencies develop their own contracts. Once a contract has been established, it can be renewed for years. The opportunity to bring new vendors or products in is almost impossible. Once a vendor has been awarded a contract, an agency can "standardize" on that product and purchase only it for what ever price the "authorized dealer' selects. Montgomery County should bring back the bid process. It should be the function of procurement to seek out local qualified vendors. Procurement should provide equal access to contracts by not limiting the scope of the specification to favor 1 or 2 vendors. There is no reason to limit the period of time to a small window to place items on a contract. Procurement should go back to using bids and seek out local vendors. There should be either a limit or some oversight to the amount of procurement that can be given to the same vendor.
  • A new bid was created for school pictures and the county didn't have good information for the basis of the process.
  • I am a local MBE/DBE office furniture dealership, living in Montgomery County as well as owning a business located in Montgomery County. My children attended Mont Cty Public Schools. Yet, as both a business and residential taxpayer the majority of the furniture business is awarded to a vendor outside the County. It has been virtually impossible getting assistance that is meaningful.
  • I never see any bids for commercial printing. I know the public schools send a tremendous amount to Virginia, but neglects to keep it in Maryland. I went to Montgomery county schools. A bit surprised Maryland businesses are not valued

Sunday, January 5, 2014

9,000+ MCPS Elementary Students in Trailers, Doctors Warn Frostbite Can Happen in Minutes.

...Doctors warn that frostbite can happen in minutes.
"A first-degree frostbite is redness to the tissue when it warms up, a second-degree is blistering, and a third-degree frostbite is actual death of tissue," said Dr. Donald Steiner, Advocate Good Samaritan Hospital.
Chicago Public Schools will be open for classes on Monday and Tuesday next week despite the cold temperatures.
CPS spokesperson Joel Hood said any students who can't make it to school will be given excused absences, but the schools will remain open to give students a warm, safe place to go.
Because of the dangerous cold weather, all schools in the state of Minnesota will be closed Monday. The governor of Wisconsin is considering the same action. The city of Milwaukee has already announced there will be no classes there...  More from ABC Chicago.

From The Weather Channel: A chart showing how long it takes for frostbite to occur at various temperatures.

http://www.weather.com/outlook/recreation/ski/tools/windchill/

MPCS students are going to be outside of main buildings during Tuesday, January 7th's record cold.  That means that just to go to lunch or to the bathroom these students will have to experience these record cold temperatures. The majority of the students in classroom trailers are in elementary school.

Friday, July 19, 2013

Gazette: Montgomery County schools to get more unmonitored security cameras

Montgomery County Public Schools will see new security measures including cameras added at its buildings after the County Council voted Tuesday to allocate both state and county funds toward the efforts that will cost about $9 million.
The vote Tuesday approved $1.67 million in new county funds to add to about $3.1 million already approved within the county’s capital improvements program.
The roughly $9 million in new security spending includes about $4 million from a state school security initiative — money the county had to match to receive, said James Song, director of the school system’s department of facilities management... 
...County Councilman George Leventhal (D-At large) of Takoma Park raised the concern he said he heard from a constituent that the cameras would not be continuously monitored. (then he voted for the funding)... 
...County Councilman Marc Elrich (D-At large) of Takoma Park said he was concerned that the cameras would only be used to look back for evidence of an incident that had occurred, rather than helping direct security to an ongoing situation. (then he voted for the funding)... 
...and, don't miss this statement from MCPS staff, it's all on the kids... 
Song said the system’s next steps regarding security will include developing programs and drill practices to ensure kids are prepared.
 http://www.gazette.net/article/20130716/NEWS/130719225/1124/montgomery-county-schools-to-get-more-security-cameras&template=gazette

Sunday, July 14, 2013

Council to Approve Fake Security for Schools - $5.8 Million

On Tuesday, July 16th at 1:30 PM the Montgomery County Council will hold a public hearing and then immediately vote to approve the expenditure of $5,860,000 for what is being called "school security."

Will this expenditure actually do anything to keep students safe during the school day?  The vast majority of these funds will go to an outside vendor for interior school cameras that will NOT BE MONITORED.  So the answer is no, these cameras do nothing to keep students safe in real time. These cameras are only used as evidence of crimes after the fact and bear no relationship to the real time safety of students.

The Montgomery County Council's Education Committee already discussed this funding request and unanimously approved it.  Listen to the discussion for yourself and hear MCPS' Robert Hellmuth, Director of School Security, say

  "The cameras are really never monitored."


Thursday, March 8, 2012

Another no-bid procurement coming to Montgomery Co.?

Why not? This is how we buy Promethean Boards, artificial turf, visitor entry systems, security cameras in schools, and the first batch of exterior bus cameras that we don't want to use anymore. Why use a Request for Proposal (RFP) when you can just go shopping!
...Richard Harrison, program manager of MCPD's Automated Traffic Enforcement Unit, has said each camera will likely cost between $5,000 and $8,000, and the county can either put out a request for proposals or negotiate a deal with the vendors it currently uses for speed and red-light cameras...
Patch:  County Council Backs School Bus Cameras

Monday, January 2, 2012

Suddenly, Ethics rode into town.

When was the last time the Montgomery County Board of Education's Ethics Panel met to discuss a possible ethics violation?  How many years has it been? 


What has brought about this sudden change at MCPS? Could it be that there is a new sheriff in town? 


What about all of the other conflicts of interest that have existed for years on the ranch? Will the new sheriff push for a review of those issues as well, or was this just a one time ethics review just for show? 


In December of 2011, the MCPS Ethics Panel actually met, discussed an ethics issue, and issued an Opinion.  The Opinion is shown below with the names of the parties redacted.  

Redacted Montgomery County Board of Education Ethics Panel Advisory Opinion

Thursday, September 22, 2011

Twitter used for impromptu student rally at Gaithersburg High School


Patch:  Students Organize Counter Pep-Rally Using Twitter


After school officials canceled a pep rally, students at Gaithersburg High School today protested by organizing a riot-like rally of their own.
Students used Twitter and other social media tools to organize the protest rally.
The original rally, part of Spirit Week, a week-long homecoming celebration, was called off shortly before it was scheduled to start at 12:30 this afternoon after some students became "overly spirited," according to Gaithersburg Principal Dr. Christine Handy-Collins...

Friday, August 12, 2011

Gazette: Leggett seeks to slash capital spending

Montgomery could cut $150 million from new schools, libraries
...Leggett said his goal is to reduce the county’s $4 billion capital spending plan by $25 million each year through fiscal 2018. He instructed agencies Wednesday to propose building projects that could be eliminated or delayed in the next capital budget. The cuts could affect projects such as new schools, recreation centers and libraries....
...The school system’s current capital spending plan for fiscal years 2013 through 2016 totals $887 million, although that number is subject to change when the Board of Education approves a new capital budget for 2013 to 2018 later this year, said Bruce Crispell, director of the school system’s Division of Long-Range Planning. Leggett is recommending the school system reduce its capital budget by $33.9 million between fiscal 2013 and 2016 — about 4 percent of its planned capital expenses.
A new middle school for the Clarksburg and Damascus areas is projected to cost $44.1 million. An addition to Bradley Hills Elementary in Bethesda will cost $11.6 million. Upgrades to heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems in schools countywide have a projected price tag of $26.1 million.
Crispell said now is a good time to build from a construction viewpoint, but that the economy isn’t necessarily in a position to support revenues for all the desired projects.
“We don’t have a choice,” said Councilman Hans Riemer (D-At large) of Silver Spring. “We do have to cut back. And it’s painful because it is a cheap time to borrow and build.”

MontCo aims to cut $150 million in construction projects | Rachel Baye | Business | Washington Examiner


...Montgomery County Public Schools will bear the second-largest cut. The school system has been asked to cut about $34 million of its $887 million capital budget. Chief Operating Officer Larry Bowers said it's too early to say what will be most affected, especially because the school system receives funding from sources other than the county..
Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://washingtonexaminer.com/news/business/2011/08/montco-aims-cut-150-million-construction-projects#ixzz1UmKDhQdg

Monday, September 27, 2010

36 Security Cameras Installed at Pyle Middle School in Bethesda

Pyle, last MCPS middle school to receive security cameras


Independent contractors installed 36 cameras at Pyle this summer as part of the capitol improvement plan to assist employees. 
Some Pyle students said they think the cameras are intended to prevent  incidents, like last year’s sexting scandal, from occurring in the future. Seventh grade student Emma Wesley said she isn’t fully comfortable with the idea of having cameras throughout Pyle.
“Everyone feels a little uneasy, as if someone is always watching them and every move of theirs is being recorded,” Wesley said.
But principal Jennifer Webster said the cameras will be beneficial for the school.
“In every situation, you get multiple different versions of the truth from different people, and having the video helps sort out the fact,” Webster said. “They can help us solve even the smallest of problems, like retrieving students’ iPods and wallets that get stolen from classrooms.”

Note to readers: Did the Board of Education ever vote to install security cameras inside school buildings? Was this $23 million (+/-) purchase ever put out for a competitive bid?  
Answer to both questions is no


You can read more about this major purchase made without public input here.

Tuesday, January 12, 2010

Consultant Payment Approved - No Discussion

At today's Board of Education meeting the Board approved a $125,000 payment to a consultant by unanimous consent.  There was no discussion of this expenditure, nor has there been any explanation or detail provided as to the purpose or scope of "support" to be provided.

The first time this consultant appeared in Board of Education minutes was in March of 2009 as a sole source procurement* (no other bids were taken). See the notation from the March 10, 2009, memo from Superintendent Weast below.

However, an IQinVision press release from March 2008 (a year before) announced that this consultant was already working with MCPS. Under what Board authority was this consultant being paid before March of 2009? 

This is an election year for 4 Board of Education seats currently held by Patricia O'Neill, Shirley Brandman, Judy Docca and Michael Durso. This is just one example of the level of oversight exerted by these Board members over the MCPS Operating budget.

*This blog post was updated as of 7:45 pm, January 12, 2009.

Monday, June 22, 2009

Operators Standing by to Take Your Calls

Did you know that the Montgomery County Office of Inspector General has established an independent toll-free hotline, using a third-party contractor to confidentially take calls from County government employees and contractors?

Purpose – The OIG is interested in receiving information confidentially from employees and contractors. Our responsibility is to receive and evaluate your concerns regarding fraud, waste, and abuse, and when appropriate, conduct an investigation. We report our conclusions to management for a decision on any corrective action and/or a prosecutor for potential criminal matters.

We define fraud, waste, and abuse as follows:

Fraud

A dishonest and intentional course of action that results in obtaining money, property, or an advantage to which the individual committing the action would not normally be entitled.

Waste

The needless, careless, or extravagant expenditure of County funds, incurring of unnecessary expenses, or misuse of County resources or property.

Abuse

The intentionally wrongful or improper use of County resources that can include the excessive or improper use of one’s position, in a manner contrary to its rightful or legally intended use.


When reporting information, be prepared to provide the following:

· The person(s) involved and title(s) · When the incident occurred

· Where · How

· How long · How often

· How the caller knows

· Is there documentation

· Others who have knowledge

· Any steps already taken

Friday, May 1, 2009

Gompers Inc or Gompers Not

To most parents of MCPS students, the name James Gompers rings no bells. But in the eyes of MCPS Director of School Safety and Security Bob Hellmuth, Gompers is one of the most knowledgeable and trustworthy security experts in the fields of video surveillance and visitor tracking systems.

How much do Security Director Hellmuth and the Board of Education really know about the man who is advising MCPS how to spend millions of dollars to secure our schools?

Security Director Hellmuth was so impressed by Gompers that he hired him to select millions of dollars of video cameras and computer-based visitor tracking systems for our schools. Hellmuth had so much confidence in Gompers that he even disregarded the MCPS procurement procedures and state laws that require that competitive bids must be solicited for large purchases. Even the selection of Gompers, Inc. as the security consulting firm was made on a "no-bid" basis by Hellmuth.

Gompers' main published credential is that he has experience in the security industry. He has written several minimally-technical articles about security cameras and related equipment and is a frequent presenter at trade shows. Gompers' articles are typically followed by the following statement, or similar wording:
James Gompers is founder and president/CEO of Gompers Inc., which is made up of Gompers Technologies Design Group (GTD Group), Gompers Technologies Testing and Research Group (GTTR Group) and the Gompers Alliance. The Gompers Alliance pools talent from top consulting firms in the security, communications and data industries. He has more than 20 years of experience in the security industry.”
Any résumé that Gompers gave Hellmuth would presumably have had much greater detail than provided above because Hellmuth let Gompers go right to work based on just a proposal that has never been signed by any BOE member or MCPS employee. (Perhaps, at some point, MCPS will be able to locate a contract that was signed by Nancy Navarro, who was the BOE president at the time that Gompers began providing his services.)

And what about those four business entities that Mr. Gompers runs? James Gompers lives in Illinois, and records from the Illinois Secretary of State (ISS) show that he has, indeed, registered four corporations and one LLC in his home state. What Gompers hasn’t done for several years, according to Illinois state records, is submit corporate tax statements for his companies. His failure to submit the tax statements led to involuntary dissolution of each of his companies.


(Click on any of the images below to enlarge.)








Even though disqualified under Illinois law from operating as a corporation, Gompers, Inc. issued proposals and provided consulting services to MCPS, and accepted payments from MCPS.

According to Illinois state records, none of Gompers' companies are in good legal standing, so Gompers should not have been doing business under any of his (disqualified) company names.

Maybe that's why MCPS hasn't been able to produce copies of any ratified contracts between Gompers and MCPS.

But even without a ratified contract, the BOE approved payments of over $61,000 to one of Gompers' non-existent companies for consulting services.

What we still don't know, though, is why Gompers has not filed the corporate tax statements for any of his companies in several years. While that's an issue for Gompers to resolve with the state of Illinois, it would seem to raise enough red flags that perhaps the BOE should review the quality of services and independence of product recommendations that Gompers provided to MCPS.

Thursday, April 30, 2009

Weast spins Springbrook while replacing staff with cameras

The Washington Post is running the following statement from Superintendent Jerry Weast in an article on the Springbrook incident.
He praised a police officer assigned to the school for knowing one of the suspects well enough that the student ultimately confided in him. "It's truly about relationships," Weast said.
If Superintendent Weast believes this statement why is he out buying 13,000 security cameras and replacing security staff with cameras?

Why didn't Board President Nancy Navarro sign the contract for the purchase of the security cameras, and why wasn't this shift from people to cameras discussed at the Board of Education table?

Wednesday, April 29, 2009

MCPS: More cameras, less security staff in schools

While attending a conference* in Dallas, Texas in February 2009, MCPS Director of School Safety and Security Bob Hellmuth gave a video interview. In that interview, Mr. Hellmuth states that,
"It is so much cheaper to install cameras than it is to go hire additional security staff." (At minute 4:30)
In light of the news from Northwest High School, and now the news from Springbrook High School, when was the decision made by the Board of Education to forgo hiring security staff and instead replace people with cameras?

How much are the 13,000 (?) cameras that are being purchased to replace the existing cameras going to cost? When was the cost-benefit analysis done on this procurement and where are the results? Is it really cheaper to replace cameras than hire security staff? When did the Board of Education evaluate these options, review the costs and make this decision?

*Mr. Hellmuth attended a conference in Dallas, Texas during the MCPS "travel freeze" (click link and see page 5 of memo from MCPS COO Larry Bowers for statement on MCPS travel freeze due to budget restrictions)

First posted March 27, 2009 on the Parents' Coalition of Montgomery County blog. Updated and re-run in response to arrests at Springbrook High School.

Thursday, March 26, 2009

Knapp: People have a right to know where our money is going

In an article in today's Washington Post, County Councilmember Mike Knapp is quoted as saying,
"How could a payout package of public dollars not be public record?" he said. "People have a right to know where our money is going."
Well said, Councilmember Knapp! Now when will that statement apply to the Montgomery County Public School system, the entity that spends 50% of the county budget?

When will the public know how the missing 700 Promethean Boards were procured, how much they cost and if they were financed or bought outright?

When will the public know what has happened to the money in Independent Activity Funds that has not been accounted for, or has been spent on non student purchases?

When will the public know how many IP Cameras MCPS has purchased and for how much?

When will the public see the E-Rate rebate funds brought to the County Council for appropriation?

Monday, March 23, 2009

Navarro Board buys cameras, but how many?


Sources indicate that over the last two years MCPS has purchased new IP security cameras to replace the security cameras that were purchased in 1999. But how many new IP security cameras have been purchased over the last two years? Board of Education minutes are silent on this question. For the last two years the Board of Education President has been Nancy Navarro.

Only press releases from vendors and security news services give a hint. The purchase was not documented in Board minutes and no contract was signed for this multi-million dollar procurement. Have 578, 1,900, 3000 or 3,775 IP security cameras been purchased by the Board of Education for installation in MCPS this year?

Here are some clues:

This press release from a Security Conference says that MCPS "expects to have more than 3,000 digital cameras installed in the school district by the end of the year and a total of 12,000 to 13,000 cameras by the end of the initiative."

This press release says that MCPS "middle schools,
which on average are deploying 50 IQeye cameras." There are 35 MCPS middle schools. 50 X 38 would mean that 1,900 IQeye security cameras are already in MCPS middle schools alone.

This press release says that MCPS high schools are getting "about 70-80 cameras" and middle schools are getting "about 50 IQeye megapixel cameras per school." There are 25 high schools in MCPS. 25 x 75 would be 1,875 security cameras at the high schools. Adding the high school cameras to the middle school cameras would put the number of security cameras being installed in MCPS schools this year at about 3,775.

This March 19, 2009, web conference says that MCPS has "578 IP security cameras installed and hope to have 6,000 installed by the end of the project."

You be the detective and investigate how many new IP security cameras MCPS has installed, and has on order. Post your finding in the comment section to this blog article. Who knows, you may solve the mystery!

Security Webcast Scrubbed?

"I do have to start things off with some bad news ... Robert Hellmuth, the director of the department of public safety and security for the Montgomery County Public Schools has been called into a department of education meeting ..."
― Sam Pfeifle, Editor, Security Systems News

This webcast was broadcast live on Thursday, March 19, 2009. There is no record of an MCPS BOE meeting on that day.

(Related bad news is here.)

Hear it here:






The Essential Guide to Deploying HD Video Surveillance Webcast